Back

Lockdown Effect on COVID-19 Spread in India: National Data Masking State-Level Trends

Basu, D.; Salvatore, M.; Kleinsasser, M.; Purkayastha, S.; Bhattacharyya, R.; Mukherjee, B.

2020-05-27 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.05.25.20113043
Show abstract

IntroductionIndia has been under four phases of a national lockdown from March 25 to May 31 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Unmasking the state-wise variation in the effect of the nationwide lockdown on the progression of the pandemic could inform dynamic policy interventions towards containment and mitigation. MethodsUsing data on confirmed COVID-19 cases across 20 states that accounted for more than 99% of the cumulative case counts in India till May 31, 2020, we illustrate the masking of state-level trends and highlight the variations across states by presenting evaluative evidence on some aspects of the COVID-19 outbreak: case-fatality rates, doubling times of cases, effective reproduction numbers, and the scale of testing. ResultsThe estimated effective reproduction number R for India was 3.36 (95% confidence interval (CI): [3.03, 3.71]) on March 24, whereas the average of estimates from May 25 - May 31 stands at 1.27 (95% CI: [1.26, 1.28]). Similarly, the estimated doubling time across India was at 3.56 days on March 24, and the past 7-day average for the same on May 31 is 14.37 days. The average daily number of tests have increased from 1,717 (March 19-25) to 131,772 (May 25-31) with an estimated testing shortfall of 4.58 million tests nationally by May 31. However, various states exhibit substantial departures from these national patterns. ConclusionsPatterns of change over lockdown periods indicate the lockdown has been effective in slowing the spread of the virus nationally. The COVID-19 outbreak in India displays large state-level variations and identifying these variations can help in both understanding the dynamics of the pandemic and formulating effective public health interventions. Our framework offers a holistic assessment of the pandemic across Indian states and union territories along with a set of interactive visualization tools that are daily updated at covind19.org.

Matching journals

The top 14 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 6%
7.7%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 57%
7.7%
3
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 30%
5.9%
4
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 1%
4.6%
5
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 1%
3.0%
6
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 6%
2.9%
7
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 8%
2.9%
8
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 31%
2.9%
9
Scientific Data
based on 30 papers
Top 0.8%
2.5%
10
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 6%
2.5%
11
Science
based on 46 papers
Top 2%
2.5%
12
Epidemiology and Infection
based on 80 papers
Top 4%
2.3%
13
Epidemics
based on 96 papers
Top 4%
2.3%
14
Science Advances
based on 52 papers
Top 1%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
15
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
based on 16 papers
Top 1%
1.8%
16
BMJ Global Health
based on 95 papers
Top 8%
1.8%
17
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
based on 50 papers
Top 6%
1.6%
18
BMC Research Notes
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
1.6%
19
Wellcome Open Research
based on 34 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
20
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 10%
1.3%
21
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 12%
1.3%
22
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 13%
1.3%
23
PLOS Digital Health
based on 88 papers
Top 10%
1.2%
24
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 37%
1.2%
25
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 10%
0.8%
26
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 22%
0.8%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 12%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 25%
0.8%
29
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
based on 54 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
30
JMIRx Med
based on 29 papers
Top 5%
0.8%