Multi-site Validation of a SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM Rapid Antibody Detection Kit
Minteer, C.; Casanovas-Massana, A.; Li, T.; McDonald, D.; Wang, L.; Pan, S. H.; Caianiello, D.; Collinski, J.; deRamon, E.; Hale, R.; Howell, R.; Ray, J.; Vinetz, J.; Levine, M.; Ko, A.; Spiegel, D.
Show abstract
Deaths from coronavirus disease (COVID-19) have exceeded 300,000 persons globally, calling for rapid development of mobile diagnostics that can assay widespread prevalence and infection rates. Data provided in this study supports the utility of a newly-designed lateral flow immunoassay (LFA) for detecting SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies. We employed a clinical cohort of 1,892 SARS-CoV-2 patients and controls, including individuals diagnosed by RT-qPCR at Yale New Haven Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Hefei City (Hefei CDC), Anhui Province (Anhui Province CDC), and Fuyang City (Fuyang CDC). The LFA studied here detects SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies with a specificity of 97.9-100% for IgM, 99.7-100% for IgG, and sensitivities ranging from 94.1-100% for patients >14-days post symptom onset. Sensitivity decreases in patients <14-days post symptom onset, which is likely due to lower IgG/IgM antibody levels in this population. Finally, we developed a visual intensity reporting system that we believe will be suitable for laboratory and point-of-care settings, and will provide granular information about antibody levels. Overall our results support the widespread utility of this and other LFAs in assessing population-level epidemiological statistics.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sensitivity evaluation of 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) RT-PCR detection kits and strategy to reduce false negative 96%
- A High-throughput Microsphere-based Immunoassay of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM Testing for COVID-19 Diagnostics 95%
- Evaluation of performance of two SARS-CoV-2 Rapid whole-blood finger-stick IgM-IgGCombined Antibody Tests 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analytical comparison of over-the-counter multiplex tests for influenza A, influenza B and SARS-CoV-2 96%
- A Reagent and Virus Benchmarking Panel for a Uniform Analytical Performance Assessment of N Antigen–Based Diagnostic Tests for COVID-19 95%
- Performance of the Cue COVID-19 Molecular Test for Point of Care: Insights from a multi-site clinic service model 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reducing the Cost of Rapid Antigen Tests through Swab Pooling and Extraction in a Device 94%
- Evaluation of commercial qPCR kits for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in pooled samples 93%
- Evaluation and modelling of the performance of an automated SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay according to sample type, target population and epidemic trends 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Serological SARS-CoV-2 Lateral Flow Assays for Rapid Point of Care Testing 96%
- Analytical and Clinical Comparison of Three Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Detection 95%
- Comparison of Commercially Available and Laboratory Developed Assays for in vitro Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Laboratories 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Field-deployable, rapid diagnostic testing of saliva samples for SARS-CoV-2. 94%
- Validation of a rapid, saliva-based, and ultra-sensitive SARS-CoV-2 screening system for a pandemic-scale infection surveillance 94%
- A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in at-home collected finger-prick dried blood spots 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.