Worker-behavior and behavior-behavior interaction networks in the trap-jaw ant Odontomachus chelifer (Latreille, 1802)
Neves, F. M.; Borges, M. E.; Pie, M. R.
Show abstract
Division of labor is among the main factors to explain the evolutionary success of social systems, from the origins of multicellularity to complex animal societies. The remarkable ecological success of social insects seems to have been largely driven by ergonomic advantages stemming from the behavioral specialization of workers. However, little is known about how individuals and their corresponding behavioral repertoires are related to each other within a division of labor context, particularly by viewing such relationships as complex networks. Applications of network theory to the study of social insects are almost exclusively used to analyze behavioral interactions between individuals, rather than to the study of relations among individuals and behaviors. Here, we use an approach to the study of the organization of the behavioral repertoire of ant colonies that considers both individual-behavior interactions and behavior-behavior interactions, besides colony time budgets. Our study investigates the organization of division of labor in colonies of the trap-jaw ant Odontomachus chelifer (LO_SCPLOWATREILLEC_SCPLOW, 1802). All the behavioral acts (including inactivity) performed within three queenright colonies of different sizes (n = 7, 30, and 60 workers) were studied under controlled laboratory conditions. Each ant was individually marked and observed by scan sampling in 10 min intervals for 10 h each (n = 5,919 behavioral acts). We describe the network topologies in terms of centrality, specialization, modularity, and nestedness. This study shows that workers of O. chelifer are organized according to structured networks, composed of individuals exhibiting varying degrees of specialization. The observed centrality scores indicate that some behaviors could have a disproportionately larger impact on the network organization (especially self-grooming). The results underscore the potential of the use of complex networks (particularly measures of modularity and nestedness) in order to discover and study novel organizational patterns of social groups in animal behavior.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Interactions and information: Exploring task allocation in ant colonies using network analysis 97%
- Similarities in the behaviour of dance followers among honey bee species suggest a conserved mechanism of dance communication 92%
- Female assortment in Gouldian Finch (Chloebia gouldiae) Flocks: A case of female-driven social niche construction? 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using an agent based model to inform sampling design for animal social network analysis 94%
- Social integration in temporal multiplex association networks predicts offspring survival in female Geoffroy's spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) 93%
- Large body size variation is linked to low communication success in tandem running ants 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Individual behavioral type captured by a Bayesian model comparison of cap making by sponge crabs 92%
- Linking Parasitism to Network Centrality and the Impact of Sampling Bias in its Interpretation 92%
- Negative and positive interspecific interactions involving jellyfish polyps in marine sessile communities 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bipartite network analysis of ant-task associations reveals task groups and absence of colonial daily activity 95%
- Flexibility in the social structure of male chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) in the Budongo Forest, Uganda 93%
- Rising Temperature Drives Tipping Points in Mutualistic Networks 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.