Back

A comparative study of isothermal nucleic acid amplification methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection at point of care

Tran, D. H.; Hoang, Q. C.; Tran, H. T.; Le, U. P.; Do, H. D. K.; Bui, L. M.; Nguyen, D. H.; Hoang, T. L.; Nguyen, T. T. T.; Nguyen, H. A.; Nguyen, T. H.; Cao, M. T.; Vu, V. V.; Phung, H. T. T.

2020-05-25 molecular biology
10.1101/2020.05.24.113423 bioRxiv
Show abstract

COVID-19, caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, has spread worldwide and put most of the world under lockdown. Despite that there have been emergently approved vaccines for SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths have remained rising. Thus, rapid diagnosis and necessary public health measures are still key parts to contain the pandemic. In this study, the colorimetric isothermal nucleic acid amplification tests (iNAATs) for SARS-CoV-2 detection based on loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), cross-priming amplification (CPA), and polymerase spiral reaction (PSR) were designed and evaluated. The three methods showed the same limit of detection (LOD) value of 1 copy of the targeted gene per reaction. However, for the direct detection of SARS-CoV-2 genomic-RNA, LAMP outperformed both CPA and PSR, exhibiting the LOD value of roughly 43.14 genome copies/reaction. The results can be read with the naked eye within 45 minutes, without cross-reactivity to closely related coronaviruses. Moreover, the direct detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in simulated patient specimens by iNAATs was also successful. Finally, the ready-to-use lyophilized reagents for LAMP reactions were shown to maintain the sensitivity and LOD value of the liquid assays. The results indicate that the colorimetric lyophilized LAMP kit developed herein is highly suitable for detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids at point-of-care.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Talanta
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.0%
4
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
5
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
6
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
7
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
8
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
9
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
10
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
11
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
12
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
13
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
16
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
BioTechniques
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
18
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
19
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Virus Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
24
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
26
Journal of Microbiological Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
28
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
29
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%