Back

Evidence-Based Quality Scores for Rating Drug Products and Their Utility in Health Systems

Dabestani, A.; Bazil, C. W.; Costantino, R. C.; Fox, E.; Graedon, J.; Lever, H.; Makuch, R.; White, C. M.

2020-08-26 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2020.05.22.20110775 medRxiv
Show abstract

The quality of drug products in the United States, which are largely produced overseas, has been a matter of growing concern.1 Buyers and payers of pharmaceuticals, whether they are health-systems, insurers, PBMs, pharmacies, physicians, or patients, have little to no visibility into any quality metrics for the manufacturers of drug products or the products themselves. A system of "quality scores" is proposed to enable health-systems and other purchasers and payers of medication to differentiate among drug products according to evidence-based metrics. Metrics influencing the quality scores described herein include both broadly applicable regulatory information and more drug-specific, third-party chemical analysis information. The aggregation of these metrics through a proposed set of rules results in numerical values on a 0-100 scale that may be further simplified into a red/yellow/green designation. The simplicity of such scores enables seamless integration into existing healthcare systems and an integration scheme is proposed. Using real-world data from currently on-market valsartan drug products, this proposed system generated a variety of quality scores for six major manufacturers. These scores were further evaluated according to their current market price showing no significant correlation between quality score and price. The implementation of drug quality scores at healthcare institutions in the United States and their potential utilization by regulators, could create a much-needed, market-driven incentive for pharmaceutical manufacturers to produce quality medications that would reduce drug shortages and improve public health.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
24.1%
2
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.7%
3
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
7
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
8
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
9
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
10
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
11
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
12
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
13
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
14
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
15
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
17
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
18
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
20
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
22
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.8%
24
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
26
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
28
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
29
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%