Back

Comparative physiology of five tropical montane songbirds reveals differential seasonal acclimatisation and cold adaption

Jones, S. E. I.; Suanjak, M.; Tobias, J. A.; Freeman, R.; Portugal, S. J.

2020-05-26 ecology
10.1101/2020.05.22.111328 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The physiology of tropical birds is poorly understood, particularly in how it relates to local climate and changes between seasons. This is particularly true of tropical montane species, which may have sensitive thermal tolerances to local microclimates. We studied metabolic rates (using open flow respirometry), body mass and haemoglobin concentrations of five sedentary Mesoamerican songbirds between the summer and winter at two elevations (1550 m and 1950 m, respectively). We asked whether there were uniform seasonal shifts in physiological traits across species, and whether higher elevation species displayed evidence for cold tolerance. Seasonal shifts in metabolic rates differed between the three species for which data were collected. Basal metabolic rates in one species - black-headed nightingalethrushes Catharus mexicanus - were up-regulated in summer (~19% increase of winter metabolism), however two other species displayed no seasonal regulation. No species exhibited shifts in haemoglobin concentrations across season or across elevation, whereas body mass in two species was significantly higher in the summer. One species restricted to higher elevations - ruddy-capped nightingale-thrushes C. frantzii - displayed physiological traits indicative of cold-tolerance. Although only summer data were available for this species (C. frantzii), metabolic rates were constant across temperatures tested (5-34{degrees}C) and haemoglobin concentrations were significantly higher compared to the other four species. Our results suggest that seasonal acclimatisation in physiological traits is variable between species and appear unrelated to changes in local climate. As such, the distinct physiological traits observed in ruddy-capped nightingale-thrushes likely relate to historic isolation and conserved physiological traits rather than contemporary climatic adaption.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.6%
2
Journal of Thermal Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
3
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
4
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
6
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological and Integrative Physiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.6%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
13
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
16
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Marine Ecology Progress Series
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
19
Ecological Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Ibis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
29
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
30
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%