Hidden components of microbiome diversity revealed by cell wall lysis with Adaptive Focused Acoustics
Wallace, G. F.; Ahluwalia, S.; Thovarai, V.; Laugharn, J. A.; Khoja, H.; Sen, S. K.
Show abstract
Within the rapidly evolving field of microbiome sequencing, a primary need exists for experimentally capturing microbiota in a manner as close as possible to their in vivo composition. During microbiome profiling, the first step necessarily involves lysis of the cell wall, releasing nucleic acids for next-generation sequencing. Microbial cell wall thicknesses can vary between 5nm to 80nm; while some species are quite easy to lyse, others are particularly resistant to lysis. Despite this, current chemical/mechanical lysis protocols ignore the possibility that species with different cell wall thicknesses are lysed at differential rates. This creates noise in species compositions and possibly skews current microbiome results in ways that are not currently understood. To develop a cell wall thickness-agnostic lysis protocol, we used Adaptive Focused Acoustics (AFA), a tunable acoustic methodology for processing of biological samples. Using identical aliquots of mouse stool homogenate as the lysis substrate, we compared AFA with chemical/mechanical lysis methodology routinely used in microbiome studies and found that AFA-mediated lysis substantially increases both microbial DNA yield as well as alpha and beta diversity. By starting with lower AFA energy levels, sequentially removing aliquots at each step, and subjecting the remainder to progressively stronger AFA treatment, we developed a sequential lysis method that accounts for differences in cell wall thickness. This method revealed even greater levels of diversity than single-timepoint AFA treatment. 16S sequencing results from the above experiments were verified by shotgun metagenome sequencing of a subset of the AFA samples. We found that lysis-induced noise affects not just species compositaions, but also functional characterization of shotgun metagenome data. AFA samples also showed a higher detection of eukaryotic and fungal DNA. We suggest that AFA-mediated lysis produces a truer representation of the native microbiota, and that this method deserves consideration as a potential addition to microbiome lysis protocols.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Defining the resilience of the human salivary microbiota by a 520 days longitudinal study in confined environment: the Mars500 mission 94%
- Ultra-accurate Microbial Amplicon Sequencing with Synthetic Long Reads 94%
- Single Amplified Genome Catalog Reveals the Dynamics of Mobilome and Resistome in the Human Microbiome 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using fecal immunochemical tubes for the analysis of gut microbiome has potential to improve colorectal cancer screening 95%
- Evaluation of microbiome enrichment and host DNA depletion in human vaginal samples using Oxford Nanopore's adaptive sequencing 94%
- On the robustness of inference of association with the gut microbiota in stool, swab and mucosal tissue samples 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Preparation of functional metagenomic libraries from low biomass samples using METa assembly and their application to capture antibiotic resistance genes 95%
- Optimizing mouse metatranscriptome profiling by selective removal of redundant nucleic acid sequences 94%
- Illumina Complete Long Read Assay yields contiguous bacterial genomes from human gut metagenomes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- MiDAS 5: Global diversity of bacteria and archaea in anaerobic digesters 94%
- Growth phase estimation for abundant bacterial populations sampled longitudinally from human stool metagenomes. 93%
- Antibiotics promote intestinal growth of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae by enriching nutrients and depleting microbial metabolites 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.