Back

A new method to triage colorectal cancer referrals in the UK using serum Raman spectroscopy and machine learning

Jenkins, C. A.; Chandler, S.; Jenkins, R.; Thorne, K.; Woods, F.; Cunningham, A.; Nelson, K.; Still, R.; Walters, J.; Gywnne, N.; Chea, W.; Harford, R.; O'Neill, C.; Hepburn, J.; Hill, I.; Wilkes, H.; Fegan, G.; Dunstan, P.; Harris, D. A.

2020-05-23 primary care research
10.1101/2020.05.20.20108209 medRxiv
Show abstract

Suspected colorectal cancer (CRC) referrals based on non-specific symptoms currently lead to large numbers of patients being referred for invasive investigations and poor yield in cancer detection. Secondary care diagnostics, particularly endoscopy, struggle to meet the ever-increasing demand and patients face lengthy waits from the point of referral. Here we propose a blood test utilising high-throughput Raman spectroscopy and machine learning as an accurate triage tool. We present results from the first mixed methods clinical validation study of its kind, evaluating the ability of the test to perform in its target population of primary care patients, and its acceptability to those administering and receiving the test. The test was able to accurately rule out cancer with a negative predictive value of 98.0%. This performance could reduce the number of invasive diagnostic procedures in the cohort by at least 47%. Collectively, our findings promote a novel, non-invasive solution to triage CRC referrals with potential to reduce patient anxiety, accelerate access to treatment and improve outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
2
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.9%
4
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
5
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
8
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.9%
9
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.7%
11
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.4%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
16
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
17
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
18
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
19
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
20
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
29
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
30
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%