Evaluation and Optimization of Motion Correction in Spinal Cord fMRI Preprocessing
Dehghani, H.; Weber, K. A.; Batouli, S. A. H.; Oghabian, M. A.; Khatibi, A.
Show abstract
Motion correction is an essential step in the preprocessing of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, improving the temporal signal to noise ratio (tSNR) and removing unwanted variance. Because of the characteristics of the spinal cord (non-rigidity, surrounded by moving organs), motion correction becomes especially challenging. We compared the efficiency of different motion correction protocols and suggest a preferred method for spinal cord fMRI data. Here we acquired gradient-echo echo-planar-imaging axial lumbar spinal cord fMRI data during painful mechanical stimulation of the left lower extremity of 15 healthy volunteers on a 3T scanner. We compared multiple motion correction techniques: 2D and 3D FLIRT realignment with and without slice-wise regulation, SliceCorr (implemented in the Spinal Cord Toolbox) and proposed a method 3D FLIRT in addition to Slice Regulation (SLiceReg) along the spinal cord. TSNR, image entropy, DVARS, image Sum of Absolute Differences and number of activated voxels in the spinal cord from GLM analysis to evaluate the performance of multiple motion correction procedures. The tSNR and DVARS 3D FLIRT + SLiceReg were significantly improved over other realignment methods (p<0.001). In comparison, tSNR=14.20{+/-}0.02 and DVARS=165.77{+/-}1.54 were higher than other methods. Additionally, the number of activated voxels of the statistical map in our suggested method was higher than the other realignment methods (p<0.05). Our results illustrated the proposed motion correction algorithm that integrated 3D motion correction and 2D slicewise regularization along spinal cord curvature could improve subject-level processing outputs by reducing the effects of motions. Our proposed protocols can improve subject-level analysis, especially in lumbar region that suffers from involuntary motions and signal loss due to susceptibility effect more than other spinal cord regions.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing the efficacy of data-driven denoising methods for a multi-echo fMRI acquisition at 7T 96%
- Cerebral artery segmentation based on magnetization-prepared two rapid acquisition gradient echo multi-contrast images in 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging 96%
- Is it Time to Switch Your T1W Sequence? Assessing the Impact of Prospective Motion Correction on the Reliability and Quality of Structural Imaging 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A library for fMRI real-time processing systems in python (RTPSpy) with comprehensive online noise reduction, fast and accurate anatomical image processing, and online processing simulation 96%
- Evaluating the quality of brainstem ROI registration using structural and diffusion MRI 96%
- Model-based and model-free analyses of the neural correlates of tongue movements 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vascular origins of low-frequency oscillations in the cerebrospinal fluid signal in resting-state fMRI: Interpretation using photoplethysmography 96%
- Typicality of Functional Connectivity robustly captures motion artifacts in rs-fMRI across datasets, atlases and preprocessing pipelines 95%
- DCP: a pipeline toolbox for diffusion connectome 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.