Strict Physical Distancing May Be More Efficient: A Mathematical Argument for Making Lockdowns Count
Bilinski, A.; Fitzpatrick, M. C.; Sheffield, S. R.; Swartwood, N. A.; Williamson, A.; York, A.
Show abstract
COVID-19 created a global public health and economic emergency. Policymakers acted quickly and decisively to contain the spread of disease through physical distancing measures. However, these measures also impact physical, mental and economic well-being, creating difficult trade-offs. Here we use a simple mathematical model to explore the balance between public health measures and their associated social and economic costs. Across a range of cost-functions and model structures, commitment to intermittent and strict social distancing measures leads to better overall outcomes than temporally consistent implementation of moderate physical distancing measures. With regard to the trade-offs that policymakers may soon face, our results emphasize that economic and health outcomes do not exist in full competition. Compared to consistent moderation, intermittently strict policies can better mitigate the impact of the pandemic on both of these priorities for a range of plausible utility functions.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of Mitigation and Control Policies in Realistic Epidemic Models Accounting for Household Transmission Dynamics 95%
- Pricing Treatments Cost-Effectively When They Have Multiple Indications: Not Just a Simple Threshold Analysis 94%
- Evaluation of Contact-Tracing Policies Against the Spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Austria– An Agent-Based Simulation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost and social distancing dynamics in a mathematical model of COVID-19 with application to Ontario, Canada 96%
- Optimal health and economic impact of non-pharmaceutical intervention measures prior and post vaccination in England: a mathematical modelling study 95%
- Vaccine escape in a heterogeneous population: insights for SARS-CoV-2 from a simple model 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 Dynamics: A Heterogeneous Model 95%
- Model-based impact evaluation of new tuberculosis vaccines in aging populations under different modeling scenarios: the case of China. 92%
- Dynamic causal modeling of the COVID-19 pandemic in northern Italy predicts possible scenarios for the second wave 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.