Hydroxychloroquine alone or in combination with azithromycin to prevent major clinical events in hospitalised patients with coronavirus infection (COVID-19): rationale and design of a randomised, controlled clinical trial
Cavalcanti, A. B.; Zampieri, F. G.; Azevedo, L. C.; Rosa, R. G.; Avezum, A.; Veiga, V. C.; Lopes, R. D.; Kawano-Dourado, L.; Damiani, L. P.; Pereira, A. J.; Serpa Neto, A.; Furtado, R.; Tomazini, B.; Bozza, F. A.; Maia, I. S.; Falavigna, M.; Lisboa, T. C.; Fonseca, H.; Machado, F. R.; Berwanger, O.; COALITION COVID-19 Brazil I Investigators,
Show abstract
IntroductionHydroxychloroquine and its combination with azithromycin have been suggested to improve viral clearance in patients with COVID-19, but its effect on clinical outcomes remains uncertain. Methods and analysisWe describe the rationale and design of an open-label pragmatic multicentre randomised (concealed) clinical trial of 7 days of hydroxychloroquine (400 mg BID) plus azithromycin (500 mg once daily), hydroxychloroquine 400 mg BID, or standard of care for moderately severe hospitalised patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 (in-patients with up to 4L/minute oxygen supply through nasal catheter). Patients are randomised in around 50 recruiting sites and we plan to enrol 630 patients with COVID-19. The primary endpoint is a 7-level ordinal scale measured at 15-days: 1)not hospitalised, without limitations on activities; 2)not hospitalised, with limitations on activities; 3)hospitalised, not using supplementary oxygen; 4)hospitalised, using supplementary oxygen; 5)hospitalised, using high-flow nasal cannula or non-invasive ventilation; 6)hospitalised, on mechanical ventilation; 7)death. Secondary endpoints are the ordinal scale at 7 days, need for mechanical ventilation and rescue therapies during 15 days, need of high-flow nasal cannula or non-invasive ventilation during 15 days, length of hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, thromboembolic events, occurrence of acute kidney injury, and number of days free of respiratory support at 15 days. Secondary safety outcomes include prolongation of QT interval on electrocardiogram, ventricular arrhythmias, and liver toxicity. The main analysis will consider all patients with confirmed COVID-19 in the groups they were randomly assigned. Ethics and disseminationThis study has been approved by Brazils National Ethic Committee (CONEP) and National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA). An independent data monitoring committee will perform interim analyses and evaluate adverse events throughout the trial. Results will be submitted for publication after enrolment and follow-up are complete, as well as presented and reported to local health agencies. ClinicalTrials.gov identifierNCT04322123 O_LSTStrengths and limitations of this studyC_LSTO_LIPragmatic randomised controlled trial of 7 days of hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine or standard of care for moderately severe in-patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 C_LIO_LIMulticentre: around 50 recruiting sites in Brazil with planned enrolment of 630 patients (1:1:1) C_LIO_LIThe primary endpoint is a 7-level ordinal scale ([1] not hospitalised, without limitations on activities; [2] not hospitalised, with limitations on activities; [3] hospitalised, not using supplementary oxygen; [4] hospitalised, using supplementary oxygen; [5] hospitalised, using high-flow nasal cannula or non-invasive ventilation; [6] hospitalised, on mechanical ventilation; [7] death) measured at 15 days. C_LIO_LIOpen label design (no placebo) C_LI
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Adverse effects of remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, and lopinavir/ritonavir when used for COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials 94%
- Favipiravir for treating novel coronavirus (COVID-19) patients: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials 94%
- Efficacy of remdesivir versus placebo for the treatment of COVID-19: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A placebo-controlled double blind trial of hydroxychloroquine in mild-to-moderate COVID-19 96%
- Antiviral drugs in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 - the DisCoVeRy trial 94%
- An open-label randomized, controlled trial of the effect of lopinavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir plus IFN-β-1a and hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 – Final results from the DisCoVeRy trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hydroxychloroquine For The Treatment Of Severe Respiratory Infection By COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial 96%
- A Multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of hydroxychloroquine and a retrospective study in adult patients with mild to moderate Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) 94%
- Doxycycline for the prevention of progression of COVID-19 to severe disease requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission: a randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel group trial (DOXPREVENT.ICU) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- No evidence of clinical efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 infection with oxygen requirement: results of a study using routinely collected data to emulate a target trial 95%
- Prophylaxis for covid-19: living systematic review and network meta-analysis 93%
- Prone positioning of patients with moderate hypoxia due to COVID-19: A multicenter pragmatic randomized trial [COVID-PRONE] 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Decision support system to evaluate VENTilation in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (DeVENT study) – Trial Protocol 93%
- Statistical Analysis Plan for the Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Electronic Early Notification of Sepsis in Hospitalized Ward Patients (SCREEN): a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 92%
- Statistical Analysis Plan for the Helmet Non-Invasive Ventilation for COVID-19 Patients (Helmet-COVID) Randomized Controlled Trial 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.