Back

Use of inhibitors of the renin angiotensin system and COVID-19 prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Barochiner, J.; Martinez, R.

2020-05-26 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.05.19.20106799 medRxiv
Show abstract

Backgroundcontroversy has arisen in the scientific community on whether the use of renin angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors in the context of COVID-19 would be of benefit or harmful. A meta-analysis of eligible studies comparing the occurrence of severe and fatal COVID-19 in infected patients who were under treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) vs no treatment or other antihypertensives was conducted. MethodsPubMed, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library, MedRxiv and BioRxiv were searched for relevant studies. Fixed-effect models or random-effect models were used depending on the heterogeneity between estimates. Resultsa total of fifteen studies with 21,614 patients were included. The use of RAS inhibitors was associated with a non-significant 20% decreased risk of the composite outcome (death, admission to intensive care unit, mechanical ventilation requirement or progression to severe or critical pneumonia): RR 0.81 (95%CI: 0.631.04), p=0.10, I2=82%. In a subgroup analysis that included hypertensive subjects only, ACEI/ARB were associated with a 27% significant decrease in the risk of the composite outcome (RR 0.73 (95%CI: 0.56 0.96), p=0.02, I2=65%). Conclusionthe results of this pooled analysis suggest that the use of ACEI/ARB does not worsen the prognosis, and could even be protective in hypertensive subjects. Patients should continue these drugs during their COVID-19 illness.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
17.3%
3
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
4
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.5%
5
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
7
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
9
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
10
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
12
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
13
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
20
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
24
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
27
RMD Open
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%