Back

DNA from dried blood spots yields high quality sequences for exome analysis

Sunderam, U.; Adhikari, A. N.; Kundu, K.; Puck, J. M.; Currier, R.; Kwok, P.-Y.; Brenner, S. E.; Srinivasan, R.

2020-05-20 genomics
10.1101/2020.05.19.105304 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDNA sequencing of archived dried blood spots (DBS) collected by newborn screening programs constitutes a potential health resource to study newborn disorders and understand genotype-phenotype relationships. However, its essential to verify that sequencing reads from DBS derived DNA are suitable for variant discovery. ResultsWe explored 16 metrics to comprehensively assess the quality of sequencing reads from 180 DBS and 35 whole blood (WB) samples. These metrics were used to assess a) mapping of reads to the reference genome, b) degree of DNA damage, and c) variant calling. Reads from both sets mapped with similar efficiencies, had similar overall DNA damage rates, measured by the mismatch rate with the reference genome, and produced variant calls sets with similar Transition-Transversion ratios. While evaluating single nucleotide changes that may have arisen from DNA damage, we observed that the A>T and T>A changes were more frequent in DNA from DBS than from WB. However, this did not affect the accuracy of variant calling, with DBS samples yielding a comparable count of high quality SNVs and indels in samples with at least 50x coverage. ConclusionsOverall, DBS DNA provided exome sequencing data of sufficient quality for clinical interpretation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.