A role for neutral variation in the evolution of C4 photosynthesis
Karki, S.; Lin, H.; Danila, F. R.; AbuJamous, B.; Giuliani, R.; Emms, D. M.; Coe, R. A.; Covshoff, S.; Woodfield, H.; Bagunu, E.; Thakur, V.; Wanchana, S.; Slamet-Loedin, I.; Cousins, A. B.; Hibberd, J. M.; Kelly, S.; Quick, W. P.
Show abstract
Convergent trait evolution is a recurrent phenomenon in all domains of the tree of life. While some convergent traits are caused by simple sequence changes, many are associated with extensive changes to the sequence and regulation of large cohorts of genes. It is unknown how organisms traverse this expansive genotype space to assemble such complex convergent phenotypes. C4 photosynthesis is a paradigm of large-scale phenotypic convergence. Conceptual and mathematical models propose that C4 photosynthesis evolved from ancestral C3 photosynthesis through sequential adaptive changes. These adaptive changes could have been rapidly assembled if modifications to the activity and abundance of enzymes of the C4 cycle was neutral in C3 plants. This neutrality would enable populations of C3 plants to maintain genotypes with expression levels of C4 enzymes analogous to those in C4 species and thus enable rapid assembly of a functional C4 cycle from naturally occurring genotypes given shared environmental selection. Here we show that there is substantial natural variation in expression of genes encoding C4 cycle enzymes between natural accessions of the C3 plant Arabidopsis thaliana. We further show through targeted transgenic experiments in the C3 crop Oryza sativa, that high expression of the majority of C4 cycle enzymes in rice is neutral with respect to growth, development, biomass and photosynthesis. Thus, substantial variation in the abundance and activity of C4 cycle enzymes is permissible within the limits of operation of C3 photosynthesis and the emergence of component parts of this complex convergent trait can be facilitated by neutral variation.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The VIL gene CRAWLING ELEPHANT controls maturation and differentiation in tomato via polycomb silencing 96%
- Epistatic interactions between PHOTOPERIOD-1, CONSTANS 1 and CONSTANS 2 modulate the photoperiodic response in wheat 96%
- The Arabidopsis receptor kinase STRUBBELIG regulates the response to cellulose deficiency 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Oligosaccharide production and signaling correlate with delayed flowering in an Arabidopsis genotype grown and selected in high 96%
- Evolutionary conservation and multilevel post-translational control of S-adenosyl-homocysteine-Hydrolase in land plants 95%
- The genetic interaction of REVOLUTA and WRKY53 links plant development, senescence, and immune responses 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Arabidopsis UMAMIT30 transporter contributes to amino acid root exudation 95%
- Low nitrogen availability inhibits the phosphorus starvation response in maize (Zea mays ssp. mays L.) 95%
- Gene expression profile of the developing endosperm in durum wheat provides insight into starch biosynthesis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Correction of frameshift mutations in the atpB gene by translational recoding in chloroplasts of Oenothera and tobacco. 93%
- Blue light promotes ascorbate synthesis by deactivating the PAS/LOV photoreceptor that inhibits GDP-L-galactose phosphorylase 93%
- BIG participates in the Arg/N-degron pathways and the hypoxia response in Arabidopsis thaliana. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Auxin promotion of seedling growth via ARF5 is dependent on the brassinosteroid-regulated transcription factors BES1 and BEH4. 95%
- Development of mPing-based Activation Tags for Crop Insertional Mutagenesis 92%
- Mutations in components of the TREX-2 complex result in misexpression of the Kelch-domain F-Box protein KFB39 promoter in Arabidopsis thaliana 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.