Back

Antiviral activity of Glucosylceramide synthase inhibitors against SARS-CoV-2 and other RNA virus infections

Vitner, E. B.; Avraham, R.; Achdout, H.; Tamir, H.; Agami, A.; Cherry, L.; Yahalom-Ronen, Y.; Politi, B.; Erez, N.; Melamed, S.; Paran, N.; Israely, T.

2020-05-19 microbiology
10.1101/2020.05.18.103283 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The need for antiviral drugs is real and relevant. Broad spectrum antiviral drugs have a particular advantage when dealing with rapid disease outbreaks, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic. Since viruses are completely dependent on internal cell mechanisms, they must cross cell membranes during their lifecycle, creating a dependence on processes involving membrane dynamics. Thus, in this study we examined whether the synthesis of glycosphingolipids, biologically active components of cell membranes, can serve as an antiviral therapeutic target. We examined the antiviral effect of two specific inhibitors of GlucosylCeramide synthase (GCS); (i) Genz-123346, an analogue of the FDA-approved drug Cerdelga(R), (ii) GENZ-667161, an analogue of venglustat which is currently under phase III clinical trials. We found that both GCS inhibitors inhibit the replication of four different enveloped RNA viruses of different genus, organ-target and transmission route: (i) Neuroinvasive Sindbis virus (SVNI), (ii) West Nile virus (WNV), (iii) Influenza A virus, and (iv) SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, GCS inhibitors significantly increase the survival rate of SVNI-infected mice. Our data suggest that GCS inhibitors can potentially serve as a broad-spectrum antiviral therapy and should be further examined in preclinical and clinical trial. Analogues of the specific compounds tested have already been studied clinically, implying they can be fast-tracked for public use. With the current COVID-19 pandemic, this may be particularly relevant to SARS-CoV-2 infection. One Sentence SummaryAn analogue of Cerdelga(R), an FDA-approved drug, is effective against a broad range of RNA-viruses including the newly emerging SARS-CoV-2.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Antiviral Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.6%
2
Virus Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
3
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.0%
4
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.1%
5
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
7
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
9
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
10
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
11
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.4%
13
ACS Infectious Diseases
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
14
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
15
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
17
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
21
Journal of General Virology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.7%
23
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
25
Virology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
26
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
Protein & Cell
25 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
28
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%