A Real-Time Statistical Model for Tracking and Forecasting COVID-19 Deaths, Prevalence and Incidence
Syage, J. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundPandemics do not occur frequently and when they do there is a paucity of forecasting tools that could help drive government responses to mitigate worst outcomes. Here we provide a forecasting model that is based on measurable variables and that strives for simplicity over complexity to obtain stable convergent forecasts of death, prevalence, incidence, and safe days for social easing. MethodsWe assume, based on prior pandemic data, that death rate rise and fall approximately follows a Gaussian distribution, which can be asymmetric, which we describe. By taking daily death data for foreign countries and U.S. states and fitting it to an appropriate Gaussian function provides an estimate of where in the cycle a particular population lies. From that time point one can integrate remaining time to obtain a final total death. By also using measured values for the time from infection to recovery or death and a mortality factor, the prevalence (active cases) and incidence (new cases) totals and rate curves can be constructed. It is also possible by setting a downward threshold on prevalence that an estimate of a minimum date to begin relaxing social restrictions may be considered. ResultsTo demonstrate the model we chose the most severe hot-bed countries and U.S. states as a testbed to evolve and improve our model and to compare with other models. The model can readily be applied to other countries by inputting data from public data bases. We also compare our forecasts to the University of Washington (UW) IHME model and are reassuringly similar yet show less variability on a weekly basis. The sum of squares for error (SSE) for international and U.S. states, respectively, that we track are: 26% and 26% for our model vs. 41% and 46% for the IHME model. ConclusionsOur model appears closest to the UW IHME model; however, there are important differences and while both models forecast many of the same results of interest, each one offers unique benefits that the other does not. We believe that the model reported here excels for its simplicity, which makes the model easy to use.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Simple discrete-time self-exciting models can describe complex dynamic processes: a case study of COVID-19 95%
- On the use of growth models for forecasting epidemic outbreaks with application to COVID-19 data 95%
- Emerging from the COVID-19 pandemic: impacts of variants, vaccines, and duration of immunity 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Extended compartmental model for modeling COVID-19 epidemic in Slovenia 94%
- A new, simple method of describing COVID-19 trajectory and dynamics in any country based on Johnson Cumulative Distribution Function fitting 94%
- A new estimation method for COVID-19 time-varying reproduction number using active cases 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pandemic Policy Design Via Feedback: A Modelling Study 93%
- Measuring the impact of nonpharmaceutical interventions on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic at a city level: An agent-based computational modeling study of the City of Natal 93%
- A Sliding Window Approach to Optimize the Time-varying Parameters of a Spatially-explicit and Stochastic Model of COVID-19 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.