Back

Immunosurveillance of CCR6+ T-cells predicts treatment response to dimethyl-fumarate: implications for personalized treatment strategies in multiple sclerosis

Alifieris, C.; Kim-Schulze, S.; Katz Sand, I.; Casaccia, P.; Ntranos, A.

2020-05-18 neurology
10.1101/2020.05.15.20102137 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThe field of multiple sclerosis (MS) has seen a tremendous expansion of treatments in the past decade. However, treatment response in individual patients can currently be determined only by waiting for breakthrough disease activity to occur. This highlights a critical need for biomarkers that can predict treatment response and stratify the risk of impeding disease activity before damage is inflicted to the CNS. Here we show that CCR6+CD3+ T-cell surveillance in peripheral blood can be used to discriminate responders and non-responders to dimethyl-fumarate. MethodsA cohort of 101 treatment-naive, dimethyl-fumarate (DMF) treated MS patients and healthy controls was immunophenotyped and then responders and non-responders were determined retrospectively after clinical and radiographic follow up. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, linear and logistic regression, mixed effects models, and cox proportional hazards were used for the analysis. ResultsAmong various clinical and immunophenotypic metrics, the percentage of CCR6+CD3+ T-cells was the most significant predictor of impending disease activity. This immunophenotypic metric was able to discriminate responders and non-responders to DMF with an area under the ROC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.71-0.99), which was higher than that achieved using surrogate metrics for T-helper-1-like T-helper-17 or T-cytotoxic-17 cells. DMF-treated patients with the highest percentage of CCR6+CD3+ T-cells had a significantly higher risk of impending disease activity compared to patients with a low percentage. InterpretationChanges in CCR6+CD3+ T-cells in the periphery could precede disease activity by many months and potentially serve as an early biomarker of treatment response, at least for DMF. These results have implications for novel personalized treatment strategies in MS.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.6%
2
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.2%
4
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
5
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
7
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
8
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
9
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
10
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
11
Clinical Immunology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
15
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
16
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
17
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
22
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.6%
27
Clinical and Experimental Immunology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%
28
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
29
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
30
Journal of Neuroinflammation
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%