Early and massive testing saves lives: COVID-19 related infections and deaths in the United States during March of 2020
Hittner, J. B.; Fasina, F. O.; Hoogesteijn, A. L.; Piccinini, R.; Kempaiah, P.; Smith, S. D.; Rivas, A. L.
Show abstract
To optimize epidemiologic interventions, predictors of mortality should be identified. The US COVID-19 epidemic data -reported up to 3-31-2020- were analyzed using kernel regularized least squares regression. Six potential predictors of mortality were investigated: (i) the number of diagnostic tests performed in testing week I; (ii) the proportion of all tests conducted during week I of testing; (iii) the cumulative number of (test-positive) cases through 3-31-2020, (iv) the number of tests performed/million citizens; (v) the cumulative number of citizens tested; and (vi) the apparent prevalence rate, defined as the number of cases/million citizens. Two metrics estimated mortality: the number of deaths and the number of deaths/million citizens. While both expressions of mortality were predicted by the case count and the apparent prevalence rate, the number of deaths/million citizens was {approx}3.5 times better predicted by the apparent prevalence rate than the number of cases. In eighteen states, early testing/million citizens/population density was inversely associated with the cumulative mortality reported by 31 March, 2020. Findings support the hypothesis that early and massive testing saves lives. Other factors -e.g., population density-may also influence outcomes. To optimize national and local policies, the creation and dissemination of high-resolution geo-referenced, epidemic data is recommended.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Correction in Active Cases Data of COVID-19 for the US States by Analytical study 94%
- Late surges in COVID-19 cases and varying transmission potential partially due to public health policy changes in 5 Western states, March 10, 2020-January 10, 2021 92%
- SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Potential and Policy Changes in South Carolina, February 2020 – January 2021 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Comprehensive County Level Framework to Identify Factors Affecting Hospital Capacity and Predict Future Hospital Demand 93%
- Can tracking mobility be used as a public health tool against COVID-19 following the expiration of stay-at-home mandates? 92%
- A Syndromic Surveillance Tool to Detect Anomalous Clusters of COVID-19 Symptoms in the United States 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations Between Google Search Trends for Symptoms and COVID-19 Confirmed and Death Cases in the United States 93%
- Temporal Geospatial Analysis of COVID-19 Pre-infection Determinants of Risk in South Carolina 93%
- Phased implementation of COVID-19 vaccination: rapid assessment of policy adoption, reach and effectiveness to protect the most vulnerable in the US 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.