Early and massive testing saves lives: COVID-19 related infections and deaths in the United States during March of 2020
Hittner, J. B.; Fasina, F. O.; Hoogesteijn, A. L.; Piccinini, R.; Kempaiah, P.; Smith, S. D.; Rivas, A. L.
Show abstract
To optimize epidemiologic interventions, predictors of mortality should be identified. The US COVID-19 epidemic data -reported up to 3-31-2020- were analyzed using kernel regularized least squares regression. Six potential predictors of mortality were investigated: (i) the number of diagnostic tests performed in testing week I; (ii) the proportion of all tests conducted during week I of testing; (iii) the cumulative number of (test-positive) cases through 3-31-2020, (iv) the number of tests performed/million citizens; (v) the cumulative number of citizens tested; and (vi) the apparent prevalence rate, defined as the number of cases/million citizens. Two metrics estimated mortality: the number of deaths and the number of deaths/million citizens. While both expressions of mortality were predicted by the case count and the apparent prevalence rate, the number of deaths/million citizens was {approx}3.5 times better predicted by the apparent prevalence rate than the number of cases. In eighteen states, early testing/million citizens/population density was inversely associated with the cumulative mortality reported by 31 March, 2020. Findings support the hypothesis that early and massive testing saves lives. Other factors -e.g., population density-may also influence outcomes. To optimize national and local policies, the creation and dissemination of high-resolution geo-referenced, epidemic data is recommended.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Correction in Active Cases Data of COVID-19 for the US States by Analytical study 94%
- Late surges in COVID-19 cases and varying transmission potential partially due to public health policy changes in 5 Western states, March 10, 2020-January 10, 2021 92%
- SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Potential and Policy Changes in South Carolina, February 2020 – January 2021 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Comprehensive County Level Framework to Identify Factors Affecting Hospital Capacity and Predict Future Hospital Demand 93%
- Can tracking mobility be used as a public health tool against COVID-19 following the expiration of stay-at-home mandates? 92%
- A Syndromic Surveillance Tool to Detect Anomalous Clusters of COVID-19 Symptoms in the United States 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations Between Google Search Trends for Symptoms and COVID-19 Confirmed and Death Cases in the United States 93%
- Temporal Geospatial Analysis of COVID-19 Pre-infection Determinants of Risk in South Carolina 93%
- Phased implementation of COVID-19 vaccination: rapid assessment of policy adoption, reach and effectiveness to protect the most vulnerable in the US 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the Effect of Social Distancing Interventions on COVID-19 in the United States 90%
- How Timing of Stay-at-home Orders and Mobility Reductions Impacted First-Wave COVID-19 Deaths in US Counties 90%
- A quantitative framework to define the end of an outbreak: application to Ebola Virus Disease 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.