Development of a Predictive Score for COVID-19 Diagnosis based on Demographics and Symptoms in Patients Attended at a Dedicated Screening Unit
Zavascki, A. P.; Gazzana, M. B.; Bidart, J. P.; Fernandes, P. S.; Galiotto, A.; Kawski, C. T.; Nasi, L. A.; Falci, D. R.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe diagnosis of COVID-19 based on clinical evaluation is difficult because symptoms often overlap with other respiratory diseases. A clinical score predictive of COVID-19 based on readily assessed variables may be useful in settings with restricted or no access to molecular diagnostic tests. MethodsA score based on demographics and symptoms was developed in a cross-sectional study including patients attended in a dedicated COVID-19 screening unit. A backward stepwise logistic regression model was constructed and values for each variable were assigned according to their {beta} coefficient values in the final model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed and its area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. ResultsA total of 464 patients were included: 98 (21.1%) COVID-19 and 366 (78.9%) non-COVID-19 patients. The score included variables independently associated with COVID-19 in the final model: age [≥]60 years (2 points), fever (2), dyspnea (1), fatigue (1 point) and coryza (-1). Score values were significantly higher in COVID-19 than non-COVID-19 patients: median (Interquartile Range), 3 (2-4), and 1 (0-2), respectively; P<0.001. The score had an AUC of 0.80 (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.76-0.86). The specificity of scores [≥]4 and [≥]5 points were 90.4 (95%CI, 87.0-93.3) and 96.2 (95%CI, 93.7-97.9), respectively. ConclusionsThis preliminary score based on patients symptoms is a feasible tool that may be useful in setting with restricted or no access to molecular tests in a pandemic period, owing to the high specificity. Further studies are required to validate the score in other populations.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Decision-making in acute viral bronchiolitis: a universal guideline and a publication gap 94%
- Analyzing changes in respiratory rate to predict the risk of COVID-19 infection. 94%
- Epidemiology of Respiratory Viruses in Acute Respiratory Illnesses in Malaysia: Patterns, Seasonality and Age Distribution 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic utility of a Ferritin-to-Procalcitonin Ratio to differentiate patients with COVID-19 from those with Bacterial Pneumonia: A multicenter study 93%
- Clinical symptoms among ambulatory patients tested for SARS-CoV-2 92%
- Demographic disparities in clinical outcomes of COVID-19: data from a statewide cohort in South Carolina 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Increase in diagnoses associated with Post Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a case-control study in the total population of Region Stockholm. 93%
- Divergences on expected pneumonia cases during the COVID-19 epidemic in Catalonia: A time-series analysis of primary care electronic health records covering about 6 million people 92%
- Prevalence of Common Respiratory Viruses in Children: Insights from Post-Pandemic Surveillance 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical characteristics of 25 death cases infected with COVID-19 pneumonia: a retrospective review of medical records in a single medical center, Wuhan, China 92%
- Admissions to a large tertiary care hospital and Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity: primary, contributing, or incidental COVID-19 92%
- Performance of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test compared with real-time RT-PCR in asymptomatic individuals 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of rapid antibody test and chest computed tomography results of COVID-19 patients: A retrospective study 94%
- Real-life performance of a novel antigen detection test on nasopharyngeal specimens for SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis: a prospective study 92%
- Amplification of human β-glucoronidase gene for appraising the accuracy of negative SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results in upper respiratory tract specimens 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.