Back

Performance assessment of Respiratory Viral ELITe MGB(R) assay for the quantitative detection of influenza A/B and respiratory syncytial viruses

Piralla, A.; Giardina, F.; Fratini, A.; Sapia, D.; Rovida, F.; Baldanti, F.

2020-05-16 microbiology
10.1101/2020.05.14.097303 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Influenza (Flu) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) are responsible for lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) associated with significant hospitalization among young children. In the present study, the performances of a triplex PCR assay detecting Flu A/B and RSV were compared with our in-house single-plex assays using 160 stored respiratory specimens previously tested using a panel of laboratory-developed real-time RT-PCR. Of them, 61 were positive for FluA, 41 for FluB, and 58 for RSV. All samples were retrospectively quantified with Respiratory Viral (RV) ELITe MGB(R) Panel (ELITechGroup Molecular Diagnostics, Puteaux, France) processed using ELITe InGenius(R) system. Overall, the total percentage agreement observed was 93.4% (57/61) for FluA, 92.7% (38/41) for FluB, and 86.2% (50/58) for RSV. A significant correlation of VL values was observed between the two methods for FluA and RSV ({rho}= 0.91 and 0.84). This finding was supported by the strength of agreement between the two methods, as showed by the linear regression analysis (R2 =0.84 and 0.80). FluB viral load values measured by RV Panel were less significantly correlated ({rho}= 0.77 and R2 =0.56). The bland-Altman analysis showed how 84.2% (48/57) of FluA and 86.0% of RSV (43/50) samples fell within {+/-}1.0 Log10 variation from our laboratory results, while only 21.1% (8/38) of FluB results fell within this range. The great majority of FluB samples (29/30) outside range had values higher than +1.0 Log10 (median +2.1 Log10 range +1.0 to +3.5 Log10). In conclusion, RV ELITe MGB(R) Panel constitutes a valid and robust system for simultaneous detection and quantification of Flu A/B and RSV.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
3
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
5
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.9%
6
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
7
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
8
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.1%
10
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
15
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
16
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
17
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
20
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Journal of Immunological Methods
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
22
Journal of General Virology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
23
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
24
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
25
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%