Three distinct neural mechanisms support movement-induced analgesia
Lu, X.; Yao, X.; Thompson, W. F.; Hu, L.
Show abstract
Pain is essential for our survival by protecting us from severe injuries. Pain signals may be exacerbated by continued physical activities but can also be interrupted or over-ridden by physical movements, a process called movement-induced analgesia. A number of neural mechanisms have been proposed to account for this effect, including the reafference principle, the gate control theory of pain, and the top-down psychological modulation. Given that the analgesic effects of these mechanisms are temporally overlapping, it is unclear whether movement-induced analgesia results from a single neural mechanism or the joint action of multiple neural mechanisms. To address this question, we conducted five experiments on 130 healthy human subjects. First, the frequency of hand shaking was manipulated in order to quantify the relationship between the strength of the voluntary movement and the analgesic effect. Second, the temporal delay (between hand shaking and nociceptive laser stimuli) and the stimulated side (nociceptive laser stimuli were delivered on the hand ipsilateral or contralateral to the shaken one) were manipulated to quantify the temporal and spatial characteristics of the analgesic effect induced by voluntary movement. Combining psychophysics and electroencephalographic recordings, we demonstrated that movement-induced analgesia is a result of the joint action of multiple neural mechanisms. This investigation is the first to disentangle the distinct contributions of different neural mechanisms to the analgesic effect of voluntary movement. These findings extend our understanding of sensory attenuation arising from voluntary movement and may prove instrumental in the development of new strategies in pain management.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Guided by touch: Tactile Cues in Hand Movement Control 92%
- Tactile versus Motor Imagery: Differences in Corticospinal Excitability Assessed with single-pulse TMS 92%
- Evaluating phasic transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) with pupil dilation: the importance of stimulation intensity and sensory perception 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- High Frequency Terahertz Stimulation Alleviates Neuropathic Pain by Inhibiting the Pyramidal Neuron Activity in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex of mice 94%
- Human birth tissue products as a non-opioid medicine to inhibit post-surgical pain 94%
- Tuning of motor outputs produced by spinal stimulation during voluntary control of torque directions in monkeys 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Expectation effects on repetition suppression in nociception 96%
- Interindividual variations in peak alpha frequency do not predict the magnitude or extent of secondary hyperalgesia induced by high-frequency stimulation 94%
- Influence of sustained cognitive loading on finger circulatory and thermoperceptual responsiveness to localized cooling 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bidirectional Optogenetic Modulations of Peripheral Sensory Nerve Activity: Induction vs. Suppression through Channelrhodopsin and Halorhodopsin 94%
- Predictive attenuation of touch and tactile gating are distinct perceptual phenomena 93%
- Enhanced human sensorimotor integration via self-modulation of the somatosensory activity 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.