Expandability differences in learning transfer between computerized and non-computerized games
Shigyo, M.; Tamura, K.; Okamoto, T.
Show abstract
Computerized and non-computerized games are used in training designed to improve cognitive function. However, it is unclear which properties of the games influence the transfer of cognitive performance. This study aimed to examine the expandability of this transfer according to the properties of training tools. We introduced two training tools (virtual and standard Rubiks Cubes) and examined bidirectional transfer between the two cube types and transfer to other cognitive tasks. The results showed that transfer from the virtual cube to the standard cube was greater relative to that observed from the standard cube to the virtual cube. Regarding transfer to other tasks, cognitive transfer did not differ significantly between the virtual and standard cubes, but the training exerted beneficial effects. These results suggest that transfer expandability differed between computerized and non-computerized games. The findings of the study could contribute to the provision of an effective cognitive training programme.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-controlled practice and nudging during structural learning of a novel control interface 96%
- The relationship between object-based spatial ability and virtual navigation performance 95%
- The Relationship between Latent Inhibition, Divergent Thinking, and Eyewitness Memory: A Study on Attention to Irrelevant Stimuli 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.