Back

Self-organized map: the new aproach for study of genetic divergence in kale

Brito, O. G.; Andrade Junior, V. C. d.; Azevedo, A. M.; Silva, M. T. N. L.; Sa, L. G. d.; Rodrigues, C. H. O.; Fernandes, A. C. G.

2020-05-14 genetics
10.1101/2020.05.14.095711 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The objective of this study was to study the genetic divergence between genotypes of kale, to propose a methodology for the use of neural networks of the SOM type and to test its efficiency through Andersons discriminant analysis. We evaluated 33 families of half-siblings of kale and three commercial cultivars. The design was a randomized block with four replications with six plants per plot. A total of 14 plant-level quantitative traits were evaluated. Genetic values were predicted at family level via REML / BLUP. For the study of divergence, neural networks of the SOM type (Self-organizing Map) were adopted. We evaluated different network architectures, whose consistencies of the clusters were identified by the Anderson discriminant analysis and by the number of empty clusters. After selecting the best network configuration, a dissimilarity matrix was obtained, from which a dendrogram was constructed using the UPGMA method. The best network architecture was formed with five rows and one column, totaling five neurons and consequently five clusters. The greatest dissimilarity was established between clusters I and V. The crossing between the genotypes of cluster I and those belonging to clusters III and V are the most recommended, since they aim to recombine families with characteristics of interest to the improvement and high dissimilarity. Andersons discriminant analysis showed that the genotype classification was 100% correct, indicating the efficiency of the methodology used.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.