Back

The SARS-CoV-2 T-cell immunity is directed against the spike, membrane, and nucleocapsid protein and associated with COVID 19 severity

Thieme, C. J.; Anft, M.; Paniskaki, K.; Blazquez-Navarro, A.; Doevelaar, A.; Seibert, F. S.; Hoelzer, B.; Konik, M. J.; Brenner, T.; Tempfer, C.; Watzl, C.; Dolff, S.; Dittmer, U.; Westhoff, T. H.; Witzke, O.; Stervbo, U.; Roch, T.; Babel, N.

2020-05-16 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.05.13.20100636
Show abstract

Identification of immunogenic targets of SARS-CoV-2 is crucial for monitoring of antiviral immunity and vaccine design. Currently, mainly anti-spike (S)-protein adaptive immunity is investigated. However, also the nucleocapsid (N)- and membrane (M)-proteins should be considered as diagnostic and prophylactic targets. The aim of our study was to explore and compare the immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 S-, M- and N-proteins in context of different COVID-19 manifestations. Analyzing a cohort of COVID-19 patients with moderate, severe, and critical disease severity, we show that overlapping peptide pools (OPP) of all three proteins can activate SARS-CoV-2-reactive T-cells with a stronger response of CD4+ compared to CD8+ T-cells. Although interindividual variations for the three proteins were observed, M-protein induced the highest frequencies of CD4+ T-cells, suggesting its relevance as diagnostic and vaccination target. Importantly, patients with critical COVID-19 demonstrated the strongest T-cell response, including the highest frequencies of cytokine-producing bi- and trifunctional T-cells, for all three proteins. Although the higher magnitude and superior functionality of SARS-CoV-2-reactive T-cells in critical patients can also be a result of a stronger immunogenicity provided by severe infection, it disproves the hypothesis of insufficient SARS-CoV-2-reactive immunity in critical COVID-19. To this end, activation of effector T-cells with differentiated memory phenotype found in our study could cause hyper-reactive response in critical cases leading to immunopathogenesis. Conclusively, since the S-, M-, and N-proteins induce T-cell responses with individual differences, all three proteins should be evaluated for diagnostics and therapeutic strategies to avoid underestimation of cellular immunity and to deepen our understanding of COVID-19 immunity.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Immunology
based on 140 papers
Top 0.1%
34.4%
2
The Journal of Immunology
based on 19 papers
Top 0.2%
4.7%
3
Viruses
based on 79 papers
Top 0.8%
3.1%
4
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 21%
2.9%
5
Clinical & Translational Immunology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
2.9%
6
Cell Reports Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 1%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 1.0%
2.9%
8
Nature Immunology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.5%
2.5%
9
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 63%
2.4%
10
Science Immunology
based on 15 papers
Top 0.4%
2.4%
11
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 84%
2.4%
12
Vaccines
based on 131 papers
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Cell Reports
based on 25 papers
Top 0.7%
1.8%
14
PLOS Pathogens
based on 35 papers
Top 0.8%
1.6%
15
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
based on 10 papers
Top 0.3%
1.6%
16
Immunity
based on 11 papers
Top 0.5%
1.6%
17
JCI Insight
based on 63 papers
Top 4%
1.6%
18
Journal of Clinical Immunology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.3%
1.4%
19
Journal of Medical Virology
based on 95 papers
Top 6%
1.4%
20
Cell
based on 28 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
21
Science Translational Medicine
based on 40 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
22
mBio
based on 34 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Journal of Experimental Medicine
based on 10 papers
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
Journal of Clinical Investigation
based on 50 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
25
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
based on 39 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 21%
0.7%
27
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 8%
0.7%