Validity of Computer Based Administration of Cognitive Assessments compared to Traditional Paper-based Administration
Ye, S.; Ko, B.; Phi, H.; Eagleman, D.; Flores, B.; Katz, Y.; Huang, B.; Hosseini Ghomi, R.
Show abstract
Traditional pen and paper based neuropsychological tests (NPTs) for cognition assessment have several challenges limiting their use. They are time consuming, expensive, and require highly trained specialists to administer. This leads to testing being available to only a small portion of the population and often with wait times of several months. In clinical practice, we have found results tend not to be integrated effectively into assessment and plans of the ordering provider. Here we compared several tests using BrainCheck (BC), a computer-based NPT battery, to traditional paper-based NPTs, by evaluating individual tests as well as comparing composite scores to scores on traditional screening tools. 26 volunteers took both paper-based tests and BC. We found scores of four assessments (Ravens Matrix, Digit Symbol Modulation, Stroop Color Word Test and Trails Making A&B Test) were highly correlated. The Balance Examination and Immediate/Delayed Hopkins Verbal Learning, however, were not correlated. The BC composite score was correlated to results of the Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) exam [1], the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [2], and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Our results suggest BC may offer a computer-based avenue to address the gap between basic screening and formal neuropsychological testing.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Feasibility and reliability of online vs in-person cognitive testing in healthy older people 96%
- The negative impact of COVID-19 on working memory revealed using a rapid online quiz 94%
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cognitive function in Japanese community-dwelling older adults in a class for preventing cognitive decline 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reliability of remote self-administered web-based digital cognitive measures and comparison to in-person neuropsychological tests: Stricker Learning Span, Symbols Test and the Mayo Test Drive Screening Battery Composite 94%
- Clinical Validation and Machine Learning Optimization of MyCog: A Self-Administered Cognitive Screener for Primary Care Settings 92%
- Online46: online cognitive assessments in elderly cohorts - the British 1946 birth cohort case study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental health status of the general population, healthcare professionals, and university students during 2019 coronavirus disease outbreak in Jordan: a cross-sectional study 90%
- Differential Speed and Accuracy Trade-off in Working Memory Retrieval and Bilateral Precuneus between Older Men and Women 90%
- Life beyond childhood: insight into the lived experience of 91 adults with KBG syndrome through an online patient/caregiver reported co-produced questionnaire 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impaired everyday executive functions and cognitive strategy use on the Weekly Calendar Planning Activity in individuals with stroke undergoing acute inpatient rehabilitation 94%
- Rasch validation of a new scale to measure dependency in arm use in daily life: the Upper Limb Lucerne ICF-based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale (UL-LIMOS) 92%
- Factors Impacting Quality of Life in Multiple System Atrophy 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing and Validating a New Web-Based Tapping Test for Measuring Distal Bradykinesia in Parkinson's Disease 90%
- Development and testing of a game-based digital intervention for working memory training in autism spectrum disorder 90%
- A multipurpose machine learning approach to predict COVID-19 negative prognosis in Sao Paulo, Brazil 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.