Back

A pitfall in estimating the effective reproductivenumber Rt for COVID-19

wyler, d.; petermann, m.

2020-05-18 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.05.12.20099366
Show abstract

The effective reproductive number Rt of COVID-19 is determined indirectly from data that are only incompletely known. Approaches based on reconstructing these data by sampling time lags from suitable distributions introduce noise effects that can result in distorted estimates of Rt. This, in turn, may lead to misleading interpretations of the efficacy of the various measures taken to limit COVID-19 transmission. We discuss in some detail a study used for real time monitoring of the reproductive number in Switzerland; see https://ncs-tf.ch/en/situation-report. We argue that the method used to derive the above curve is systematically flawed and leads to an underestimation of the efficacy of the lockdown. The method adopted by the Robert Koch Institute suffers from similar deficiencies, their impact is however smaller.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Swiss Medical Weekly
based on 12 papers
Top 0.1%
13.4%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
based on 141 papers
Top 1%
11.3%
3
Epidemics
based on 96 papers
Top 0.4%
10.3%
4
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 19%
8.3%
5
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 62%
6.4%
6
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 17%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 4%
2.8%
8
Eurosurveillance
based on 77 papers
Top 3%
2.5%
9
Royal Society Open Science
based on 49 papers
Top 2%
2.5%
10
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
based on 54 papers
Top 2%
2.3%
11
Infectious Disease Modelling
based on 50 papers
Top 4%
2.3%
12
BMC Medical Research Methodology
based on 41 papers
Top 2%
1.8%
13
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 15%
1.8%
14
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 4%
1.8%
15
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 16%
1.3%
16
Science
based on 46 papers
Top 5%
1.3%
17
Epidemiology and Infection
based on 80 papers
Top 8%
1.2%
18
Epidemiology
based on 26 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
19
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
based on 166 papers
Top 11%
0.8%
20
Nature Medicine
based on 88 papers
Top 16%
0.8%
21
Wellcome Open Research
based on 34 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
22
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 21%
0.7%
23
American Journal of Epidemiology
based on 54 papers
Top 7%
0.7%
24
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 20%
0.7%