The Genomic Landscape of Prostate Cancer Brain Metastases
Rodriguez, A.; Gallon, J.; Akhoundova, D.; Maletti, S.; Ferguson, A.; Cyrta, J.; Amstutz, U.; Garofoli, A.; Paradiso, V.; Tomlins, S.; Hewer, E.; Genitsch, V.; Fleischmann, A.; Rushing, E. J.; Grobholz, R.; Fischer, I.; Jochum, W.; Cathomas, G.; Bubendorf, L.; Moch, H.; Ng, C. K.; Gillessen Sommer, S.; Piscuoglio, S.; Rubin, M. A.
Show abstract
Lethal prostate cancer commonly metastasizes to bone, lymph nodes, and visceral organs but with more effective therapies, there is an increased frequency of metastases to the brain. Little is known about the genomic drivers of prostate cancer brain metastases (PCBM). To address this, we conducted a comprehensive multi-regional, genomic, and targeted transcriptomic analysis of PCBM from 28 patients. We compared whole-exome and targeted RNA sequencing with matched primary tumors when available (n = 10) and with publicly available genomic data from non-brain prostate cancer metastases (n = 416). In addition to common alterations in TP53, AR, RB1, and PTEN, we identified highly significant enrichment of mutations in NF1 (25% cases (6/28), q = 0.049, 95% CI = 2.38 - 26.52, OR = 8.37) and RICTOR (17.9% cases (5/28), q = 0.01, 95% CI = 6.74 - 480.15, OR = 43.7) in PCBM compared to non-brain prostate cancer metastases, suggesting possible activation of the druggable pathways RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR, respectively. Compared to non-brain prostate cancer metastases, PCBM were almost three times as likely to harbor DNA homologous repair (HR) alterations (42.9% cases (12/28), p =0.016, 95% CI = 1.17 - 6.64, OR = 2.8). When considering the combination of somatic mutations, copy number alteration, and Large-scale State Transitions, 64.3% of patients (18/28) were affected. HR alterations may be critical drivers of brain metastasis that potentially provide cancer cells a survival advantage during re-establishment in a special microenvironment. We demonstrate that PCBM have genomic dependencies that may be exploitable through clinical interventions including PARP inhibition.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The genomic landscape of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers reveals multiple distinct genotypes with potential clinical impact 97%
- Role of Specialized mSWI/SNF Complexes in Prostate Cancer Lineage Plasticity 97%
- The genomic and epigenomic evolutionary history of papillary renal cell carcinomas 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Germline APOBEC3B deletion in Asian women increases somatic hypermutation in breast cancer that is associated with Her2 subtype, PIK3CA mutations, immune activation, and increased survival 91%
- Prelude to Malignancy: A Gene Expression Signature in Normal Mammary Gland from Breast Cancer Patients Suggests Pre-tumorous Alterations and Is Associated with Adverse Outcomes 91%
- Identifying predictors of HPV-related head and neck squamous cell carcinoma progression and survival through patient-derived models 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancer profiling identifies epigenetic markers of endocrine resistance and reveals therapeutic options for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients 96%
- Evaluation of homologous recombination repair status in metastatic prostate cancer by next-generation sequencing and functional tissue-based immunofluorescence assays 96%
- Single-Cell Proteomics Defines the Cellular Heterogeneity of Localized Prostate Cancer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessment of Androgen Receptor splice variant-7 as a biomarker of clinical response in castration-sensitive prostate cancer 94%
- A Subset of Localized Prostate Cancer Displays an Immunogenic Phenotype Associated with Losses of Key Tumor Suppressor Genes 94%
- Cell-free urine- and plasma DNA mutational analysis predicts neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and outcome in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.