Back

Online COVID-19 diagnosis with chest CT images: Lesion-attention deep neural networks

Liu, B.; Gao, X.; He, M.; Lv, F.; Yin, G.

2020-05-29 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2020.05.11.20097907 medRxiv
Show abstract

Chest computed tomography (CT) scanning is one of the most important technologies for COVID-19 diagnosis and disease monitoring, particularly for early detection of coronavirus. Recent advancements in computer vision motivate more concerted efforts in developing AI-driven diagnostic tools to accommodate the enormous demands for the COVID-19 diagnostic tests globally. To help alleviate burdens on medical systems, we develop a lesion-attention deep neural network (LA-DNN) to predict COVID-19 positive or negative with a richly annotated chest CT image dataset. Based on the textual radiological report accompanied with each CT image, we extract two types of important information for the annotations: One is the indicator of a positive or negative case of COVID-19, and the other is the description of five lesions on the CT images associated with the positive cases. The proposed data-efficient LA-DNN model focuses on the primary task of binary classification for COVID-19 diagnosis, while an auxiliary multi-label learning task is implemented simultaneously to draw the models attention to the five lesions associated with COVID-19. The joint task learning process makes it a highly sample-efficient deep neural network that can learn COVID-19 radiology features more effectively with limited but high-quality, rich-information samples. The experimental results show that the area under the curve (AUC) and sensitivity (recall), precision, and accuracy for COVID-19 diagnosis are 94.0%, 88.8%, 87.9%, and 88.6% respectively, which reach the clinical standards for practical use. A free online system is currently alive for fast diagnosis using CT images at the website https://www.covidct.cn/, and all codes and datasets are freely accessible at our github address.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.