Back

Reappearance of Effector T Cells Predicts Successful Recovery from COVID-19

Odak, I.; Barros-Martins, J.; Bosnjak, B.; Stahl, K.; David, S.; Wiesner, O.; Busch, M.; Hoeper, M. M.; Pink, I.; Welte, T.; Cornberg, M.; Stoll, M.; Goudeva, L.; Blasczyk, R.; Ganser, A.; Prinz, I.; Foerster, R.; Koenecke, C.; Schultze-Florey, C. R.

2020-05-15 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.05.11.20096263
Show abstract

BackgroundElucidating the role of T cell responses in COVID-19 is of utmost importance to understand the clearance of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods30 hospitalized COVID-19 patients and 60 age- and gender-matched healthy controls (HC) participated in this study. We used two comprehensive 11-color flow cytometric panels conforming to Good Laboratory Practice and approved for clinical diagnostics. FindingsAbsolute numbers of lymphocyte subsets were differentially decreased in COVID-19 patients according to clinical severity. In severe disease (SD) patients, all lymphocyte subsets were reduced, whilst in mild disease (MD) NK, NKT and {gamma}{delta} T cells were at the level of HC. Additionally, we provide evidence of T cell activation in MD but not SD, when compared to HC. Follow up samples revealed a marked increase in effector T cells and memory subsets in convalescing but not in non-convalescing patients. InterpretationOur data suggest that activation and expansion of innate and adaptive lymphocytes play a major role in COVID-19. Additionally, recovery is associated with formation of T cell memory as suggested by the missing formation of effector and central memory T cells in SD but not in MD. Understanding T cell-responses in the context of clinical severity might serve as foundation to overcome the lack of effective anti-viral immune response in severely affected COVID-19 patients and can offer prognostic value as biomarker for disease outcome and control. FundingFunded by German Research Foundation, Excellence Strategy - EXC 2155 "RESIST"-Project ID39087428, and DFG-SFB900/3-Project ID158989968, grants SFB900-B3 to R.F., SFB900-B8 to I P. and C.K.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Immunology
based on 140 papers
Top 0.1%
18.0%
2
Viruses
based on 79 papers
Top 0.5%
4.8%
3
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 16%
4.8%
4
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 47%
3.1%
5
Clinical & Translational Immunology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
3.0%
6
Cell Reports Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 1%
3.0%
7
Nature Immunology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.3%
3.0%
8
Journal of Clinical Investigation
based on 50 papers
Top 0.6%
3.0%
9
Science Immunology
based on 15 papers
Top 0.3%
2.6%
10
The Journal of Immunology
based on 19 papers
Top 0.6%
2.6%
11
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 0.8%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
12
Journal of Clinical Immunology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
2.6%
13
Nature Medicine
based on 88 papers
Top 6%
2.0%
14
JCI Insight
based on 63 papers
Top 3%
1.7%
15
PLOS Pathogens
based on 35 papers
Top 0.8%
1.7%
16
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 20%
1.4%
17
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 4%
1.4%
18
Nature
based on 58 papers
Top 6%
1.4%
19
Cell
based on 28 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
20
EBioMedicine
based on 21 papers
Top 0.4%
1.4%
21
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 12%
1.4%
22
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 90%
1.4%
23
Journal of Infection
based on 64 papers
Top 5%
1.3%
24
Journal of Experimental Medicine
based on 10 papers
Top 0.6%
1.3%
25
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 17%
1.3%
26
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 137 papers
Top 8%
1.3%
27
Journal of Medical Virology
based on 95 papers
Top 7%
1.3%
28
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
based on 39 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
29
Immunity
based on 11 papers
Top 0.9%
0.8%
30
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 16%
0.8%