Back

Risk factors for clinical progression in patients with COVID-19: a retrospective study of electronic health record data in the United Kingdom

Fletcher, R. A.; Matcham, T.; Tiburcio, M.; Anisimovich, A.; Jovanovic, S.; Albergante, L.; Lipunova, N.; Hancock, A.; Mackillop, L.; Tarassenko, L.; McCarthy, A.; Vizcaychipi, M. P.; Khan, R. T.

2020-05-15 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.05.11.20093096 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak presents a significant threat to global health. A better understanding of patient clinical profiles is essential to drive efficient and timely health service strategies. In this study, we aimed to identify risk factors for a higher susceptibility to symptomatic presentation with COVID-19 and a transition to severe disease. MethodsWe analysed data on 2756 patients admitted to Chelsea & Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust between 1st January and 23rd April 2020. We compared differences in characteristics between patients designated positive for COVID-19 and patients designated negative on hospitalisation and derived a multivariable logistic regression model to identify risk factors for predicting risk of symptomatic COVID-19. For patients with COVID-19, we used univariable and multivariable logistic regression to identify risk factors associated with progression to severe disease defined by: 1) admission to the hospitals AICU, 2) the need for mechanical ventilation, 3) in-hospital mortality, and 4) at least one measurement of elevated D-dimer ([≥]1,000 g/L) indicative of increased risk of venous thromboembolism. ResultsThe patient population consisted of 1148 COVID-19 positive and 1608 COVID-19 negative patients. Age, sex, self-reported ethnicity, C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, respiratory rate, body temperature, and systolic blood pressure formed the most parsimonious model for predicting risk of symptomatic COVID-19 at hospital admission. Among 1148 patients with COVID-19, 116 (10.1%) were admitted to the AICU, 71 (6.2%) required mechanical ventilation, 368 (32.1%) had at least one record of D-dimer levels [≥]1,000 g/L, and 118 patients died. In the multivariable logistic regression, age (OR = 0.953 per 1 year, 95% CI: 0.937-0.968) C-reactive protein (OR = 1.004 per 1 mg/L, 95% CI: 1.002-1.007), and white blood cell counts (OR = 1.059 per 109/L, 95% CI: 1.010-1.111) were found to be associated with admission to the AICU. Age (OR = 0.973 per 1 year, 95% CI: 0.955-0.990), C-reactive protein (OR = 1.003 per 1 mg/L, 95% CI: 1.000-1.006) and sodium (OR = 0.915 per 1 mmol/L, 0.868-0.962) were associated with mechanical ventilation. Age (OR = 1.023 per 1 year, 95% CI: 1.004-1.043), CRP (OR = 1.004 per 1 mg/L, 95% CI: 1.002-1.006), and body temperature (OR = 0.723 per 1{degrees}C, 95% CI: 0.541-0.958) were associated with elevated D-dimer. For mortality, we observed associations with age (OR = 1.060 per 1 year, 95% CI: 1.040-1.082), female sex (OR = 0.442, 95% CI: 0.442, 95% CI: 0.245-0.777), Asian ethnic background (OR = 2.237 vs White ethnic background, 95% CI: 1.111-4.510), C-reactive protein (OR = 1.004 per 1 mg/L, 95% CI: 1.001-1.006), sodium (OR = 1.038 per 1 mmol/L, 95% CI: 1.001-1.006), and respiratory rate (OR = 1.054 per 1 breath/min, 95% CI: 1.024-1.087). ConclusionOur analysis suggests there are several demographic, clinical and laboratory findings associated with a symptomatic presentation of COVID-19. Moreover, significant associations between patient deterioration were found with age, sex and specific blood markers, chiefly C-reactive protein, and could help early identification of patients at risk of poorer prognosis. Further work is required to clarify the extent to which our observations are relevant beyond current settings.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.4%
2
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
3
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
5
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.8%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
8
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
9
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
14
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
15
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
18
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Infectious Diseases
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
21
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
28
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
29
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%