Back

Gene expression and chromatin accessibility during progressive EMT and MET linked to dynamic CTCF engagement

Johnson, K. S.; Hussein, S.; Song, S.; Chakraborty, P.; Jolly, M. K.; Toneff, M.; Lin, Y.; Taube, J.

2020-05-13 cell biology
10.1101/2020.05.11.089110 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEpithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) facilitates cellular movements critical for proper development; however, in a carcinoma, EMT promotes metastatic dissemination. Stable intermediate states (partial-EMT) are increasingly implicated in metastatic dissemination while reversal of EMT, termed mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET), is increasingly implicated in metastatic colonization. To understand the partial and reversible nature of EMT, we characterized chromatin accessibility dynamics, transcriptome changes, protein expression patterns, as well as E-cadherin expression, localization, and gene-level dynamics in mammary epithelial cells undergoing stepwise reversible EMT. ResultsWhile shorter EMT induction induced internalization of E-cadherin protein, surface expression was recovered upon MET without loss of transcript or bulk protein. Conversely, a longer EMT induced stable repression of E-cadherin indicated by loss of chromatin accessibility and induced global expansion of accessible sites across the genome, facilitated by increased engagement of multiple transcription factor families, including AP-1 and SMAD. We observe enrichment for binding sites for the insulator proteins CTCF and BORIS was significantly diminished in both stemness-enriched partial-EMT and partial-MET states and determined that CTCF repression imparts alterations in some histone covalent modifications concomitant with those observed during TGF{beta}-induced EMT. ConclusionsThese findings are indicative of a major role for chromatin looping and reorganization in plasticity, stemness, and partial EMT phenotypes.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.