Back

A Virtual Skills Centre on Behaviour Management in Chronic Disease for Lay People in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs)

Papachristou Nadal, i.; Ganapathiram, N.; Harrison, T.; R, D.; Karthik, M.; Mallinson, P.; Angkurawaranon, C.; Nyirenda, M.; Babu, G.; Kinra, S.

2020-05-15 public and global health
10.1101/2020.05.10.20094060 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionDiabetes complications can be reduced and/or prevented by providing skills in behavioural management to lay people e.g. volunteers, family and friends. With a critical shortage of trained staff in lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to deliver these, lay people are a solution to fill this gap. Current programmes in LMICs are not suitable for lay people as they are (i) too complex i.e. for high education professionals and (ii) not easily accessible. We aim to address these two barriers through both a face-to-face and online virtual skills centre (VSC). ObjectivesThis paper describes the development of an online VSC that will provide access to those caring for people with diabetes within a community setting; examined the suitability and usability of the VSC using qualitative methods. MethodsDrawing on the DoTTI framework for developing an online program, the VSC was i) designed and developed using psychological techniques and ii) tested for early iteration using participatory workshops. ResultsA total of 23 participants from Bengaluru, India, both lay and clinicians, tested the VSC. The main themes identified were: empowerment for lay people; suitable for locals in a community setting; local services needed; user-friendly focused. ConclusionThis study found that a theory and evidence-based approach as the basis for an online behavioural management skills programme was acceptable to users. A substantive pilot will be conducted to examine whether the VSC is effective in reducing/preventing diabetes complications and how to implement into a community setting across other LMICs and chronic diseases.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.