Differentiating ADHD subtypes and simulation of in silico therapeutic neuronal excitation in a whole-brain nonlinear dynamic modelling frame-work
Iravani, B.; Arshamian, A.; Fransson, P.; Kaboodvand, N.
Show abstract
Recent advances in non-linear computational and dynamical modelling have opened up the possibility to param etrize dynamic neural mechanisms that drive complex behavior. Importantly, building models of neuronal processes is of key importance to fully understand disorders of the brain as it may provide a quantitative platform that is capable of binding multiple neurophysiological processes to phenotype profiles. In this study, we apply a newly developed adaptive frequency-based model of whole-brain oscillations to resting-state fMRI data acquired from healthy controls and a cohort of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) subjects. As expected, we found that healthy control subjects differed from ADHD in terms of attractor dynamics. However, we also found a marked dichotomy in neural dynamics within the ADHD cohort. Next, we classified the ADHD group according to the level of distance of each individuals empirical network from the two model-based simulated networks. Critically, the model was mirrored in the empirical behavior data with the two ADHD subgroups displaying distinct behavioral phenotypes related to emotional instability (i.e., depression and hypomanic personality traits). Finally, we investigated the applicability and feasibility of our whole-brain model in a therapeutic setting by conducting in silico excitatory stimulations to parsimoniously mimic clinical neuro-stimulation paradigms in ADHD. We tested the effect of stimulating any individual brain region on the key network measures derived from the simulated brain network and its contribution in rectifying the brain dynamics to that of the healthy brain, separately for each ADHD subgroup. This showed that this was indeed possible for both subgroups. However, the current effect sizes were small suggesting that the stimulation protocol needs to be tailored at the individual level. These findings demonstrate the potential of this new modelling framework to unveil hidden neurophysiological profiles and establish tailored clinical interventions.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Graph Neural Network Approach to Investigate Brain Critical States Over Neurodevelopment 97%
- Static and Dynamic Aspects of Cerebro-Cerebellar Functional Connectivity are Associated with Self-reported Measures of Impulsivity: A Resting-State fMRI Study 95%
- Transcranial ultrasound stimulation effect in the redundant and synergistic networks consistent across macaques 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Structural control energy of resting-state functional brain states reveals inefficient brain dynamics in psychosis vulnerability. 96%
- Simultaneous Modeling of Reaction Times and Brain Dynamics in a Spatial Cuing Task 95%
- Energy of functional brain states correlates with cognition in adolescent-onset schizophrenia and healthy persons 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Causality analysis in major depressive disorder for early prediction of treatment outcomes with pharmacological and neuromodulation therapies 95%
- Explainable Fuzzy Clustering Framework Reveals Divergent Default Mode Network Connectivity Dynamics in Schizophrenia 94%
- Ketamine and attentional bias to threat: dynamic causal modeling of magnetoencephalographic connectivity in treatment-resistant depression 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.