Back

Quantitatively Modeling Factors that Influence the Therapeutic Doses of Antibodies

Tang, Y.; Li, X.; Cao, Y.

2020-05-10 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2020.05.08.084095 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Dose selection and confirmation are critical tasks in the development of therapeutic antibodies. These tasks could become particularly challenging in the absence of robust pharmacodynamics biomarkers or at very flat dose-response curves. Although much knowledge has been acquired in the past decade, it remains uncertain which factors are relevant and how to select doses more rationally. In this study, we developed a quantitative metric, Therapeutic Exposure Affinity Ratio (TEAR), to retrospectively evaluate up to 60 approved antibodies and their therapeutic doses (TDs), and systematically assessed the factors that are relevant to antibody TDs and dose selection patterns. This metric supported us to analyze many factors that are beyond antibody pharmacokinetics and target binding affinity. Our results challenged the traditional perceptions about the importance of target turnovers and target anatomical locations in the selection of TDs, highlighted the relevance of an overlooked factor, antibody mechanisms of action. Overall, this study provided insights into antibody dose selection and confirmation in the development of therapeutic antibodies.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
Antibody Therapeutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
3
mAbs
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
4
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.3%
6
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
9
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
10
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
12
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
13
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Pharmaceutics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
16
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.9%
19
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
21
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
22
ChemMedChem
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
npj Vaccines
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
27
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
30
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%