Back

Utility of Cloth Masks in Preventing Respiratory Infections: A Systematic Review

Mondal, A.; Das, A.; Goswami, R. P.

2020-05-11 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.05.07.20093864 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundUsing face masks is one of the possible prevention methods against respiratory pathogens. A number of studies and reviews have been performed regarding the use of medical grade masks like surgical masks, N95 respirators etc. However, the use of cloth masks has received little attention. ObjectivesThe purpose of this review is to analyze the available data regarding the use of cloth masks for the prevention of respiratory infections. We intended to use data from both clinical and non-clinical studies to arrive at our conclusion. MethodsWe used PubMed, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar as our source databases. Both clinical and non-clinical studies, which had data regarding the efficacy of cloth masks, were selected. Articles not containing analyzable data including opinion articles, review articles etc. were excluded. After screening the search results, ten studies could be included in our review. Data relevant to our objective was extracted from each study including clinical efficacy, compliance, filtration efficacy etc. Data from some studies were simplified for the purpose of comparison. Extracted data was summarized and categorized for detailed analysis. Qualitative synthesis of the data was performed. But the heterogeneity between the studies did not allow for a meta-analysis. DiscussionThe review was limited by a lack of sufficient clinical studies. Lack of standardization between studies was another limitation. Although cloth masks generally perform poorer than the medical grade masks, they may be better than no masks at all. Filtration efficacy varied greatly depending on the material used, with some materials showing a filtration efficacy above 90%. However, leakage could reduce efficacy of masks by about 50%. Standardization of cloth masks and appropriate use is essential for cloth masks to be effective. However, result of a randomized controlled trial suggest that they may be ineffective in the healthcare setting.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
22.7%
2
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
3
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
6
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
8
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
9
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
14
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
15
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
16
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
17
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
24
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
Infectious Diseases
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
26
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
27
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
28
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
29
Access Microbiology
22 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
30
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%