Creation of a Clinical Decision-Support Tool for Assigning Occupational Disability to United States Air Force Personnel
Uptegraft, C. C.; Witkop, C. T.
Show abstract
Occupational dispositions (profiles) are the top reason active duty service members are not medically ready to deploy or fulfill their job responsibilities. An audit across multiple U.S. Air Force (AF) medical treatment facilities revealed significant shortcomings in how medical providers assign profiles. We aimed to create a predictive model and a decision-support tool that estimates profile duration. Using retrospective profiles (n=1,546,805) from the Aeromedical Services Information Management System between 1 Feb 2007 and 31 Jan 2017, we built and validated a decision-support tool that estimates profile length. Multivariate quantile regressions (n=2,575) were performed across five quantiles and six levels of diagnostic specificity for every diagnostic code with 2,100 or more observations. The models universally estimated profile duration with very poor accuracy (pseudoR2 0.000 to 0.168); however, predictive ability was directly correlated with quantile level with minimal variation by diagnostic specificity. Age, O4 to O6+ ranks, very heavy job class, and co-morbid conditions were all significant in more than 25.0% of regressions down all levels of diagnostic specificity. Age, co-morbid conditions, E7-E9 ranks, O4 to O6+ ranks, and light job class all added days to profile duration while E1 to E4 ranks, heavy, and very heavy job class subtracted days. While this study failed to produce an accurate tool, several findings, the indirect correlation between profile duration and very heavy job class and the assignment of durations based on convenient calendar times, warrant further investigation. For now, providers may consult existing decision-support tools when building profiles for AF service members, heeding attention that they were built with non-representative civilian populations. DisclaimerThe views expressed are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the US Army, US Navy, US Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the US Government.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Expanding Capabilities to Evaluate Readiness for Return to Duty after mTBI: The CAMP Study Protocol 94%
- Using a Bayesian network to classify time to return to sport based on football injury epidemiological data 92%
- Racial and Ethnic Differentials in COVID-19-Related Job Exposures by Occupational Status in the US 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying Cases of Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) Using Natural Language Processing 92%
- Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Knowledge and Perceptions: A Survey of Healthcare Workers 90%
- Initial Experience in Predicting the Risk of Hospitalization of 496 Outpatients with COVID-19 Using a Telemedicine Risk Assessment Tool 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Standardizing Phenotypic Algorithms for the Classification of Degenerative Rotator Cuff Tear from Electronic Health Record Systems 91%
- Enhancing Research Data Infrastructure to Address the Opioid Epidemic: The Opioid Overdose Network (02-Net) 89%
- Adopting an American framework to optimize nursing admission documentation in an Australian health organization 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reduced COVID-19-Related Critical Illness and Death, and High Risk of Epidemic Resurgence, After Physical Distancing in Ontario, Canada 91%
- Quantification of occupational and community risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity among healthcare workers in a large U.S. healthcare system 90%
- Estimating the maximum daily number of incident COVID-19 cases manageable by a healthcare system 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- An Observational Study of COVID-19 from A Large Healthcare System in Northern New Jersey: Diagnosis, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes 90%
- Perception of yips among professional Japanese golfers: perspectives and challenges 90%
- A Syndromic Surveillance Tool to Detect Anomalous Clusters of COVID-19 Symptoms in the United States 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.