Holobiont Urbanism: sampling urban beehives reveals cities' metagenomes
Henaff, E. M.; Najjar, D.; Perez, M.; Flores, R.; Woebken, C.; Mason, C.; Slavin, K.
Show abstract
Over half of the worlds population lives in urban areas with, according to the United Nations (UN), nearly 70% expected to live in cities by 2050 (United Nations, 2019). Our cities are built by and for humans, but are also complex, adaptive biological systems involving a diversity of other living species. The majority of these species are invisible and constitute the citys microbiome. Our design decisions for the built environment shape these invisible populations, and we interact with them on a constant basis. A growing body of evidence shows us that our health and well-being are dependent on these interactions. Indeed, multicellular organisms owe meaningful aspects of their development and phenotype to interactions with the microorganisms--bacteria or fungi--with which they live in continual exchange and symbiosis. While the processing and sequencing of samples can be high-throughput, gathering samples is still very expensive, labor intensive, and can require mobilizing large numbers of volunteers to get a snapshot of the microbial landscape of a city, such as City Sampling Day (metasub.org). Here we postulate that honeybees may be effective collaborators in the sampling process, as they daily forage within a 2-mile radius of their hive. We describe the results of a pilot study conducted with 3 rooftop beehives in Brooklyn, NY, where we evaluated the potential of various hive materials (beeswax, honey, debris, pollen, propolis) to reveal information as to the surrounding metagenomic landscape, and where we conclude that the bee debris are the richest substrate. Based on these results, we profiled 4 additional cities in this manner: Sydney, Melbourne, Venice and Tokyo. While the molecular and computational methods used here were based on DNA analysis, it is possible they could be used to monitor RNA-based viruses such as Sars-Cov-2. Here we present the results of this study, and discuss them in terms of architectural implications, as well as the potential of this method for epidemic surveillance.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Metagenomics reveals diet-specific specialization of bacterial communities in fungus gardens of grass- and dicot-cutter ants 93%
- Microclimate Shapes the Phylosymbiosis of Rodent Gut Microbiota in Jordan's Great Rift Valley 93%
- Echoes of 1816: Microbial Footprints in Heritage Artifacts From Argentina's Museum of Independence 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementing high-throughput insect barcoding in microbiome studies: impact of non-destructive DNA extraction on microbiome reconstruction 94%
- Genomic DNA extraction optimization and validation for genome sequencing using the marine gastropod Kellet's whelk 93%
- Iroki: automatic customization and visualization of phylogenetic trees 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bee foraging preferences, microbiota and pathogens revealed by direct shotgun metagenomics of honey 96%
- High molecular weight DNA extraction strategies for long-read sequencing of complex metagenomes 95%
- Balancing Barcoding and Genomics: gDNA Quality in Insect Vouchers after HotSHOT DNA extraction 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Network analysis with either Illumina or MinION reveals that detecting vertebrate species requires metabarcoding of iDNA from a diverse fly community 95%
- Host species identity shapes the diversity and structure of insect microbiota 94%
- Community Composition of Bacteria Isolated from Swiss Banknotes Varies Depending on Collection Environment 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Innovative airborne DNA approach for monitoring honey bee foraging and health 98%
- Novel eDNA approaches to monitor Western honey bee (Apis mellifera) microbial and arthropod communities 97%
- BeeDNA: microfluidic environmental DNA metabarcoding as a tool for connecting plant and pollinator communities 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.