Back

Associations between ambient air pollutants exposure and case fatality rate of COVID-19: a multi-city ecological study in China.

Zhang, T.; Zhao, G.; Luo, L.; Li, Y.; Shi, W.

2020-05-10 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2020.05.06.20088682 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEnvironmental factors, including air pollution, can strongly impact on spatio-temporal patterns of infectious diseases outbreak. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association and correlation between ambient air pollutants and case fatality rate (CFR) of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in China. MethodsPublicly accessible data on COVID-19 average CFR were utilized in the data analysis. The ambient daily air pollutants including fine particulate matter (PM2.5), inhalable particles (PM10) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) during the period from December 25, 2019 to March 5, 2020 were obtained from National Air Quality Real-time Publishing System of China. Ecological analysis was performed to explore the association and correlation between the cumulative average exposure of ambient air pollutants at different lag days (14 and 28 days) and average CFR in China outside Hubei and cities in Hubei province via model fitting. ResultsThe average case fatality rate was highest in Wuhan city (4.53%) and the cumulative average exposure of ambient PM2.5, PM10 and NO2 at lag 28 days was 55.8{+/-}12.1g/m3, 66.8{+/-}9.2g/m3, 20.7{+/-}4.4g/m3, respectively in Hubei province during the study period. Ecological analysis showed that ambient PM2.5, PM10 and NO2 exposure at both lag 14 and 28 days was positively correlated with average CFR in China outside Hubei (province-level). For city-level analysis in Hubei, significant associations were only found between cumulative ambient NO2 exposure and average CFR(r=0.693 for Lag0-14, r=0.697 for Lag0-28, respectively) during the same period. ConclusionOur findings suggested ambient PM2.5, PM10 and NO2 exposure, especially at 28 lag days, positively associated with the case fatality rate of COVID-19 in China. These results could help provide guidance for identifying potential exposure window and preventing and controlling the epidemic.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
3
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
12.5%
4
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.5%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
7
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
Indoor Air
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
9
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
13
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
14
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
16
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
18
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Journal of Occupational Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
21
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
22
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
NeuroToxicology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%