Allochronic Divergence Driven by Spatial Asynchrony in Precipitation in Neotropical Frogs?
GUARNIZO, C. E.; Montoya, P.; Quintero, I.; Cadena, C. D.
Show abstract
The role of geographic barriers in promoting reproductive isolation across space is well understood. Isolation by the time of breeding, however, may also promote population divergence when populations reproduce asynchronically in space, even in the absence of geographic barriers. Few examples exist of divergence due to breeding allochrony, particularly in vertebrates. We tested whether in Neotropical frogs asynchrony in precipitation patterns promotes intraspecific genetic divergence, speciation, and regional accumulation of diversity. We assessed the relationship between spatial asynchrony in precipitation and genetic divergence controlling for ecological connectivity across 48 Neotropical frog species. In addition, we examined whether regions within which precipitation regimes are more asynchronous across space have higher species richness and have experienced greater speciation rates. Beyond a generalized expected effect of ecological connectivity on intraspecific genetic divergence, we found that asynchrony in precipitation is positively associated with genetic differentiation in 31% of the species tested, resulting in a significantly positive cross-species effect of asynchrony in precipitation on genetic divergence in a meta-analysis. However, the effect of asynchrony in precipitation on population divergence seems not to scale to macroevolutionary patterns because spatial asynchrony in precipitation was not associated with geographical patterns of species richness or speciation rates. Our results indicate that genetic divergence can be promoted by asynchronous breeding lag in the absence of geographic barriers in species where breeding is associated with water availability, but such effects may not be stable enough through time to influence macroevolutionary patterns.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Determinants of genetic diversity and species richness of North American amphibians 96%
- Machine learning and phylogenetic models identify predictors of genetic variation in Neotropical amphibians 96%
- Comparative phylogeography reveals how a barrier filters and structures taxa in North American warm deserts 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Elevated human impact on islands increases the introduction and extinction status of native insular reptiles 94%
- Universality in biodiversity patterns: Variation in species-temperature and species-productivity relationships reveals a prominent role of productivity in diversity gradients 94%
- Source range phylogenetic community structure can predict the outcome of avian introductions 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Macrogenetics reveals multifaceted influences of environmental variation on vertebrate population genetic diversity across the Americas 95%
- Genomic, phenotypic and environmental correlates of speciation in the midwife toads (Alytes) 95%
- Divergence, gene flow and the origin of leapfrog geographic distributions: The history of color pattern variation in Phyllobates poison-dart frogs 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Panmixia across elevation in thermally sensitive Andean dung beetles 95%
- Pollinator and host sharing lead to hybridization and introgression in Panamanian free-standing figs, but not in their pollinator wasps 93%
- Does breeding season variation affect evolution of a sexual signaling trait in a tropical lizard clade? 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Disentangling the historical routes to community assembly in the global epicentre of biodiversity 95%
- Diverse strategies for tracking seasonal environmental niches at hemispheric scale 93%
- Genetic diversity varies with species traits and latitude in predatory soil arthropods (Myriapoda: Chilopoda) 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.