Modulation of neural activity in frontopolar cortex drives reward-based motor learning
Herrojo Ruiz, M.; Maudrich, T.; Kalloch, B.; Sammler, D.; Kenville, R.; Villringer, A.; Sehm, B.; Nikulin, V.
Show abstract
Decision-making is increasingly being recognised to play a role in learning motor skills. Understanding the neural processes regulating motor decision-making is therefore essential to identify mechanisms that contribute to motor skill learning. In decision-making tasks, the frontopolar cortex (FPC) is involved in tracking the reward of different alternative choices, as well as their reliability. Whether this FPC function extends to reward landscapes associated with a continuous movement dimension remains unknown. Here we used anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the right FPC to investigate its role in reward-based motor learning. Nineteen healthy human participants completed a motor sequence learning task using trial-wise reward feedback to discover a hidden performance goal along a continuous dimension: timing. As a control condition, we modulated contralateral motor cortex (left M1) activity with tDCS, which has been shown to benefit motor skill learning but less consistently reward-based motor learning. Each active tDCS condition was contrasted to sham stimulation. Right FPC-tDCS led to faster learning primarily through a regulation of exploration, without concurrent modulation of motor noise. A Bayesian computational model revealed that following rFPC-tDCS, participants had a higher expectation of reward, consistent with their faster learning. These higher reward estimates were inferred to be less volatile, and thus participants under rFPC-tDCS deemed the mapping between movement and reward to be more stable. Relative to sham, lM1-tDCS did not significantly modulate main behavioral outcomes. The results indicate that brain regions previously linked to decision-making, such as the FPC, are relevant for motor skill learning.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Timing is everything: event-related transcranial direct current stimulation improves motor adaptation 96%
- Transcranial direct current stimulation elevates the baseline activity while sharpening the spatial tuning of the human visual cortex 96%
- Beta-tACS does not impact the dynamics of motor memory consolidation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Irregular optogenetic stimulation waveforms can induce naturalistic patterns of hippocampal spectral activity 93%
- A biomimetic electrical stimulation strategy to induce asynchronous stochastic neural activity 92%
- Optimized Monophasic Pulses with Equivalent Electric Field for Rapid-Rate Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multimodal personalization of transcranial direct current stimulation for modulation of sensorimotor integration 97%
- Beneficial effects of cerebellar tDCS on motor learning are associated with altered putamen-cerebellar connectivity: a simultaneous tDCS-fMRI study 96%
- tDCS modulates effective connectivity during motor command following; a potential therapeutic target for disorders of consciousness 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural effects of TMS trains on the human prefrontal cortex 95%
- Short periods of bipolar anodal TDCS induce no instantaneous dose-dependent increase in cerebral blood flow in the targeted human motor cortex 95%
- Decoding personalized motor cortical excitability states from human electroencephalography 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.