Point-of-care testing for COVID-19 using SHERLOCK diagnostics
Joung, J.; Ladha, A.; Saito, M.; Segel, M.; Bruneau, R.; Huang, M.-l. W.; Kim, N.-G.; Yu, X.; Li, J.; Walker, B. D.; Greninger, A. L.; Jerome, K. R.; Gootenberg, J. S.; Abudayyeh, O. O.; Zhang, F.
Show abstract
The recent outbreak of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19, can be diagnosed using RT-qPCR, but inadequate access to reagents and equipment has slowed disease detection and impeded efforts to mitigate viral spread. Alternative approaches based on combinations of isothermal amplification and CRISPR-mediated detection, such as the SHERLOCK (Specific High Sensitivity Enzymatic Reporter UnLOCKing) technique, offer reduced dependence on RT-qPCR equipment, but previously reported methods required multiple fluid handling steps, complicating their deployment outside clinical labs. Here we developed a simple test chemistry called STOP (SHERLOCK Testing in One Pot) for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in one hour that is suitable for point-of-care use. This simplified test, STOPCovid, provides sensitivity comparable to RT-qPCR-based SARS-CoV-2 tests and has a limit of detection of 100 copies of viral genome input in saliva or nasopharyngeal swabs per reaction. Using lateral flow readout, the test returns result in 70 minutes, and using fluorescence readout, the test returns result in 40 minutes. Moreover, we validated STOPCovid using nasopharyngeal swabs from COVID-19 patients and were able to correctly diagnose 12 positive and 5 negative patients out of 3 replicates. We envision that implementation of STOPCovid will significantly aid "test-trace-isolate" efforts, especially in low-resource settings, which will be critical for long-term public health safety and effective reopening of the society.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Analytical comparison of over-the-counter multiplex tests for influenza A, influenza B and SARS-CoV-2 94%
- Evaluation of the Ultima Genomics UG 100 sequencer for low-cost, high-sensitivity metagenomic pathogen detection from cerebrospinal fluid 94%
- A Reagent and Virus Benchmarking Panel for a Uniform Analytical Performance Assessment of N Antigen–Based Diagnostic Tests for COVID-19 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid development and field evaluation of a portable CRISPR-based assay for Mpox during the 2025 Sierra Leone outbreak 96%
- Development and Implementation of a scalable and versatile test for COVID-19 diagnostics in rural communities 95%
- Rapid, reliable, and cheap point-of-care bulk testing for SARS-CoV-2 by combining hybridization capture with improved colorimetric LAMP (Cap-iLAMP) 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Serological SARS-CoV-2 Lateral Flow Assays for Rapid Point of Care Testing 94%
- Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 viral-load curves in paired saliva and nasal swabs inform appropriate respiratory sampling site and analytical test sensitivity required for earliest viral detection 93%
- Optimizing Hepatitis C Virus Testing in the Era of Point-of-Care RNA Diagnostics 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Refined fully automated RT-qPCR assay for simultaneous detection of SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A/B, and RSV with target optimization for improved variant resilience 95%
- Clinical evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay on a fully automated system for rapid on-demand testing in the hospital setting 94%
- CRISPR-cas13 enzymology rapidly detects SARS-CoV-2 fragments in a clinical setting 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Highly performing point-of-care molecular testing for SARS-CoV-2 with RNA extraction and isothermal amplification. 95%
- ThermiQuantTM AquaStream: A Portable Instrument for Quantitative Colorimetric Isothermal Nucleic Acid Amplification Reactions in Paper and Tube Formats 95%
- Rapid SARS-CoV-2 testing in primary material based on a novel multiplex LAMP assay 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.