Real-time assessment of COVID-19 impact on global surgical case volumes
O'Reilly-Shah, V. N.; Van Cleve, W.; Long, D. R.; Moll, V.; Evans, F. M.; Sunshine, J. E.; Kassebaum, N. J.; Harrison, E. M.; Jabaley, C. S.
Show abstract
ImportanceThe COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted global surgical capacity. The impact of the pandemic in low and middle income countries has the potential to worsen already strained access to surgical care. Timely assessment of surgical volumes in these countries remains challenging. ObjectiveTo determine whether usage data from a globally used anesthesiology calculator mobile application can serve as a proxy for global surgical case volume and contribute to monitoring of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in World Bank low income countries where official data collection is not currently practical. DesignSubset of data from an ongoing observational cohort study of users of the application collected from October 1, 2018 to April 18, 2020. SettingThe mobile application is available from public sources; users download and use the application per their own clinical needs on personal mobile devices. ParticipantsNo user data was excluded from the study. Exposure(s)Events with impacts on surgical case volumes, including weekends, holidays, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)It was previously noted that application usage was decreased on weekends and during winter holidays. We subsequently hypothesized that more detailed analysis would reveal impacts of country-specific or region-specific holidays on the volume of app use. Results4,300,975 data points from 92,878 unique users were analyzed. Physicians and other anesthesia providers comprised 85.8% of the study population. Application use was reduced on holidays and weekends and correlated with fluctuations in surgical volume. The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with substantial reductions in app use globally and regionally. There was strong cross correlation between COVID-19 case count and reductions in app use. By country, there was a median global reduction in app use to 58% of baseline (interquartile range, 46%-75%). Application use in low-income continues to decline but in high-income countries has stabilized. Conclusions and RelevanceApplication usage metadata provides a real-time indicator of surgical volume. This data may be used to identify impacted regions where disruptions to surgical care are disproportionate or prolonged. A dashboard for continuous visualization of these data has been deployed. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSCan usage data from a globally used anesthesiology calculator mobile application contribute to monitoring of the impacts to global surgical case volume caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in resource-limited environments such as World Bank low income countries? FindingsIn this ongoing observational cohort study, application usage data from 92,878 unique users in 221 countries was found to serve well as a qualitative proxy for surgical case volume, with clear impacts to app use during weekend, holidays, and during the COVID-19 pandemic. MeaningThis proxy of surgical volume will provide insight into the impact of and recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic where official data collection is not currently practical. A real time dashboard tracking this proxy of global surgical volume is live and under continued development.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving emergency department patient-doctor conversation through an artificial intelligence symptom taking tool: an action-oriented design pilot study 94%
- A Web-based, Mobile Responsive Application to Screen Healthcare Workers for COVID Symptoms: Descriptive Study 93%
- Is virtual care the new normal? Evidence supporting Covid-19’s durable transformation on healthcare delivery 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding digital health technology implementation in rehabilitation: Development of the Rehabilitation Technologies Implementation model 92%
- A typology of physician input approaches to using AI chatbots for clinical decision-making: a mixed methods study 90%
- Evaluation of two easy-to-implement digital breathing interventions in the context of daily stress levels in a series of N-of-1 trials: results from the Anti-Stress Intervention Among Physicians (ASIP) Study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Virtual reality as a strategy for intra-operatory anxiolysis and pharmacological sparing in patients undergoing breast surgeries: the V-RAPS randomized controlled trial protocol 92%
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 92%
- Prohibiting Babel - A call for professional remote interpreting services in pre-operation anaesthesia information 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine Learning for Paediatric Related Decision Support in Emergency Care - A UK and Ireland Network Survey Study 92%
- Feasibility characteristics of wrist-worn fitness trackers in health status monitoring for post-COVID patients in remote and rural areas 91%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Patient Engagement in Phase 2 Clinical Trials with a Trial-specific Patient Decision Aid (tPDA): A Development and Usability Study 92%
- How the COVID-19 pandemic is favoring the adoption of digital technologies in healthcare: a literature review 92%
- Design and implementation of a system for automated monitoring of adherence to evidenced-based clinical guideline recommendations 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.