Back

Catalytic cleavage of HEAT and subsequent covalent binding of the tetralone moiety by the SARS-CoV-2 main protease

Günther, S.; Reinke, P. Y. A.; Oberthuer, D.; Yefanov, O.; Ginn, H.; Meier, S.; Lane, T. J.; Lorenzen, K.; Gelisio, L.; Brehm, W.; Dunkel, I.; Domaracky, M.; Saouane, S.; Lieske, J.; Ehrt, C.; Koua, F.; Tolstikova, A.; White, T. A.; Groessler, M.; Fleckenstein, H.; Trost, F.; Galchenkova, M.; Gevorkov, Y.; Li, C.; Awel, S.; Peck, A.; Xavier, P. L.; Barthelmess, M.; Schlünzen, F.; Werner, N.; Andaleeb, H.; Ullah, N.; Falke, S.; Franca, B. A.; Schwinzer, M.; Brognaro, H.; Seychell, B.; Gieseler, H.; Melo, D.; Zaitsev-Doyle, J. J.; Norton-Baker, B.; Knoska, J.; Esperanza, G.; Mashhour, A. R.; G

2020-05-04 biophysics
10.1101/2020.05.02.043554 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Here we present the crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) covalently bound to 2-methyl-1-tetralone. This complex was obtained by co-crystallization of Mpro with HEAT (2-(((4-hydroxyphenethyl)amino)methyl)-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one) in the framework of a large X-ray crystallographic screening project of Mpro against a drug repurposing library, consisting of 5632 approved drugs or compounds in clinical phase trials. Further investigations showed that HEAT is cleaved by Mpro in an E1cB-like reaction mechanism into 2-methylene-1-tetralone and tyramine. The catalytic Cys145 subsequently binds covalently in a Michael addition to the methylene carbon atom of 2-methylene-1-tetralone. According to this postulated model HEAT is acting in a pro-drug-like fashion. It is metabolized by Mpro, followed by covalent binding of one metabolite to the active site. The structure of the covalent adduct elucidated in this study opens up a new path for developing non-peptidic inhibitors.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.