TEG Max Clot Strength is Consistently Elevated and May Be Predictive of COVID-19 Status at the Time of ICU Admission
Lawicki, S. D.; Wang, K. V.; Han, B.; Love, G. L.
Show abstract
BackgroundHypercoagulability is becoming widely recognized as a major complication of COVID-19 infection as evidenced by high levels of fibrinogen degradation products and microthrombi identified within the lungs and kidneys of autopsy specimens from these patients. We report thromboelastography (TEG) testing on a cohort of patients with suspected COVID-19 infection at the time of admission to the intensive care unit. MethodsTEG testing was performed using the TEG 6s analyzer near or at the time of ICU admission. We also report the results of other coagulation or inflammatory related indices such as platelet count, prothrombin time, fibrinogen, D-dimer, C-reactive protein, ferritin, and procalcitonin. All laboratory testing was performed at the discretion of the attending physician in the course of normal patient care and retrospectively reviewed. ResultsWe found that maximum clot strength was consistently elevated in COVID-19 patients while normal in all patients found to be negative. We did not encounter significant prolongations of coagulation assays outside of those expectedly prolonged by heparin therapy nor was meeting the criteria for disseminated intravascular coagulation encountered. ConclusionsWe postulate that elevated maximum clot strength by TEG testing is predictive of COVID-19 status as within our cohort this perfectly predicted patients COVID-19 status despite a high level of suspicion in negative patients with normal TEG results. While these results require a larger cohort for confirmation, we feel that TEG testing could improve confidence in COVID-19 testing results in suspected patients possibly allowing for earlier de-escalation of infectious precautions and personal protective equipment utilization.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses pre- and post- COVID-19 convalescent plasma transfusion in patients with severe respiratory failure: an observational case-control study 91%
- Mid-Regional pro-Adrenomedullin (MR-proADM), C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and Other Biomarkers in the Early Identification of Disease Progression in COVID-19 Patients in the Acute NHS Setting 91%
- Clinical and laboratory characteristics in outpatient diagnosis of COVID-19 in healthcare professionals in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pilot study to evaluate hypercoagulation and inflammation using rotational thromboelastometry and calprotectin in COVID-19 patients 97%
- Coagulation disorders in patients with severe hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis 93%
- The usefulness of D-dimer as a predictive marker for mortality in patients with COVID-19 hospitalized during the first wave in Italy 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hemodilution in High Risk Cardiac Surgery: Laboratory Values, Physiological Parameters and Outcomes 93%
- Patient ABO blood type is a major predictor of a positive DAT following a transfusion reaction 92%
- Predictive accuracy of diagnostic tests for excessive bleeding in cardiac surgery: the COPTIC-C study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Coagulation factor XII, XI, and VIII activity levels and secondary events after first ischemic stroke 92%
- Platelet Activating Immune Complexes Identified in COVID-19 Associated Coagulopathy 91%
- Utility of thromboelastography with platelet mapping (TEG-PM) for monitoring platelet transfusion in qualitative platelet disorders 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Incidence Of Venous Thrombotic Events And Events Of Special Interest In A Retrospective Cohort Of Commercially-Insured US Patients 93%
- Does the elevated (thrombosis risk of males relative to females help account for the excess male mortality observed in Covid-19? An observational study 92%
- Troponin Is Independently Associated With Death In Patients With COVID: A Retrospective Study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.