Back

TEG Max Clot Strength is Consistently Elevated and May Be Predictive of COVID-19 Status at the Time of ICU Admission

Lawicki, S. D.; Wang, K. V.; Han, B.; Love, G. L.

2020-05-05 pathology
10.1101/2020.04.30.20076703 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHypercoagulability is becoming widely recognized as a major complication of COVID-19 infection as evidenced by high levels of fibrinogen degradation products and microthrombi identified within the lungs and kidneys of autopsy specimens from these patients. We report thromboelastography (TEG) testing on a cohort of patients with suspected COVID-19 infection at the time of admission to the intensive care unit. MethodsTEG testing was performed using the TEG 6s analyzer near or at the time of ICU admission. We also report the results of other coagulation or inflammatory related indices such as platelet count, prothrombin time, fibrinogen, D-dimer, C-reactive protein, ferritin, and procalcitonin. All laboratory testing was performed at the discretion of the attending physician in the course of normal patient care and retrospectively reviewed. ResultsWe found that maximum clot strength was consistently elevated in COVID-19 patients while normal in all patients found to be negative. We did not encounter significant prolongations of coagulation assays outside of those expectedly prolonged by heparin therapy nor was meeting the criteria for disseminated intravascular coagulation encountered. ConclusionsWe postulate that elevated maximum clot strength by TEG testing is predictive of COVID-19 status as within our cohort this perfectly predicted patients COVID-19 status despite a high level of suspicion in negative patients with normal TEG results. While these results require a larger cohort for confirmation, we feel that TEG testing could improve confidence in COVID-19 testing results in suspected patients possibly allowing for earlier de-escalation of infectious precautions and personal protective equipment utilization.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
27.4%
2
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.7%
3
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
5
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.9%
6
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
7
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.6%
9
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
10
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
11
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
12
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
13
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.4%
14
Circulation Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
15
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
Transfusion
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
17
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.5%
26
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
27
Journal of Clinical Virology Plus
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.5%