Back

Profiling the effect of nafcillin on HA-MRSA D592 using bacteriological and physiological media

Seif, Y.; Poudel, S.; Tsunemoto, H.; Szubin, R.; Meehan, M. J.; Olson, C.; Rajput, A.; Alarcon, G.; Lamsa, A.; Dillon, N.; Vrbanac, A.; Sugie, J.; Daesh, S.; Monk, J.; Dorrestein, P.; Knight, R.; Pogliano, J.; Feist, A.; Palsson, B.; Nizet, V.

2020-05-01 microbiology
10.1101/2020.04.30.070904 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a leading human pathogen associated with both hospital-acquired and community-acquired infections. The bacterium has steadily gained resistance to {beta}-lactams and other important first-line antibiotics culminating in its categorization as an urgent threat by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Observations of a varying response to antimicrobial exposure as a function of media type has revealed that clinical susceptibility testing performed in standard bacteriological media might not adequately represent pharmacological responses in the patient. Such observations have encouraged research designed to identify media types that more closely mimic the in vivo environment. In this study, we examine the response of a hospital-acquired USA100 lineage methicillin-resistant, vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (MRSA/VISA) strain (D592) to nafcillin in a bacteriological compared to a more physiological tissue culture-based medium. We performed multi-dimensional analysis including growth and bacterial cytological profiling, RNA sequencing, and exo-metabolomics measurements (both HPLC and LC/MS) to shed light on the media-dependent activity of the commonly prescribed {beta}-lactam antibiotic nafcillin. O_TBL View this table: org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@85b95borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@14c1504org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f7e976org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@100598dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f770e9_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_TBL C_TBL

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
ACS Infectious Diseases
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.4%
4
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
5
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
6
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
8
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
12
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.7%
16
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.9%
18
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
21
Journal of Bacteriology
190 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
22
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
Biofilm
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%