Back

Efficacy of smoking cessation in spirometry results of COPD smokers: a randomized controlled clinical trial

alipour, a.; zarghami, m.; sharifpour, a.; taghizadeh, f.

2020-05-05 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2020.04.29.20085894 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundNicotine replacement therapy (NRT) may be more effective if it is combined with short cognitive-behavioral interventions for smoking cessation in chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasesmokers. Material and methodsTo examine the effectiveness of guided self-change (GSC), in a randomized controlled clinical trial, 57 men ranging from 45 to 77 years old were randomly assigned to three 19-member groups (GSC, NRT, and combined GSC-NRT). The primary data on smoking cessation and pulmonary functions were examined during 29 weeks using General Linear (GEE) Model status, intention-to-treat analysis, and repeated measures ANOVA test. ResultsA total of 9 (47.4%) of the participants in the GSC and combined groups and 4 (21.1%) participants in the NRT group reported total abstinence rate from smoking by the end of 29 weeks. Daily cigarette number was changed from 24 to 4 in GSC group, 26 to 11 in NRT group, and 20 to 6 in combined group. The GEE model revealed that this variable decreased in GSC group more than two other groups significantly (P=0.003). Moreover, the FVC level of the NRT group was lower than the GSC group (P=0.04), and the FEV in the NRT group was lower than GSC group (P=0.02). Furthermore, the level of FEV1/FVC act/pred in the NRT group was lower than GSC group (-6, 95% CI: -10.4-(-1.5), P=0.008) and it was also lower in the combined group than the GSC group (-6, 95% CI: -11.3-(-0.5), PV=0.03). ConclusionGSC and combined GSC-NRT treatments were equally effective in abstinence rate. Moreover Daily cigarette and the FEV1/FVC act/pred in GSC group was more than two other groups, indicating the health professionals can apply GSC alone in smoking cessation and improve lung function of COPD smokers.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.