Is physical rehabilitation superior to no physical rehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Mark-Christensen, T.; Juhl, C.; Thorborg, K.; Bandholm, T.
Show abstract
IntroductionPhysical rehabilitation is widely used following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), while no consensus has been reached regarding the optimal dosage, frequency and modality. Before a standardized protocol can be established, it is important to investigate the true efficacy for physical rehabilitation following TKA. ObjectiveTo examine if physical rehabilitation is superior to no physical rehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty in terms of patient-reported outcomes for function and pain. MethodsThe search strategy was conducted in five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cinahl, CENTRAL and SPORTDiscus) with eligibility criteria for inclusion being: Randomised controlled trials comparing patients receiving physical rehabilitation with a group receiving no physical rehabilitation following unilateral TKA. Potential sources of bias were assessed according to the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) was used to extract and report exercise interventions from the included trials. ResultsOnly two of 3254 identified trials fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included. The two trials were judged as being of moderate to good methodological quality, but lacking in the reporting of their exercise interventions. Difference in outcome measurements and interventions makes between-study comparison inconclusive. ConclusionsNo conclusion regarding the superiority of physical rehabilitation to no-intervention following TKA can be drawn from the results of this systematic review. Further research is required to establish the true effectiveness of physical rehabilitation following TKA. Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018094785.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Risk Factors for Comorbid Depression in Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review Protocol 95%
- Effectiveness and clinical relevance of kinesio taping in musculoskeletal disorders: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and evidence mapping 95%
- The devil is in the details: Reporting and transparent research practices in sports medicine and orthopedic clinical trials 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of early versus delayed rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: systematic review and meta-analyses 96%
- Perceived facilitators and barriers among physical therapists and orthopedic surgeons to pre-operative home-based exercise with one exercise-only in patients with severe knee osteoarthritis: A qualitative interview study nested in the QUADX-1 trial 95%
- Costs and models used in the economic analysis of Total Knee Replacement (TKR): A Systematic Review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of osteotomy technique (flat-cut vs wedge-cut Weil) on pain relief and complication incidence following surgical treatment for patients presenting with metatarsalgia in a private metropolitan clinic: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial 94%
- The smallest worthwhile effect on pain and function for rotator cuff repair surgery: a benefit-harm trade-off study 92%
- Moderate-Intensity Exercise Versus High-Intensity Interval Training to Recover Walking Post-Stroke: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using remotely delivered Spring Forest Qigong™ to reduce neuropathic pain in adults with spinal cord injury: A non-randomized controlled trial 91%
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Delphi Study 91%
- Fall Injury Avoidance Strategy Scale (FIAS): Development and Validation of a Scale to Quantify Fall-Related Protective Movements 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use and appropriateness of Reporting Guidelines in physical therapy research: a protocol for a meta-research study 94%
- The impact of retracted randomised controlled trials on systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines: a meta-epidemiological study 91%
- The use of the Registered Reports format for publication of randomized clinical trials: a cross-sectional study 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.