Empirical lognormality of biological variation: implications for the 'zero-force evolutionary law'
Gingerich, P. D.
Show abstract
The zero-force evolutionary law (ZFEL) of McShea et al. states that independently evolving entities, with no forces or constraints acting on them, will tend to accumulate differences and therefore diverge from each other. McShea et al. quantified the law by assuming normality on an additive arithmetic scale and reflecting negative differences as absolute values, systematically augmenting perceived divergence. The appropriate analytical framework is not additive but proportional, where logarithmic transformation is required to achieve normality. Logarithms and logarithmic differences can be negative but the proportions they represent cannot be negative. Reformulation of ZFEL in a proportional or geometric reference frame indicates that when entities evolve randomly and independently, differences smaller than any initial difference are balanced by differences larger than the initial difference. Total variance increases with each step of a random walk, but there is no statistical expectation of divergence between random-walk lineages.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Three-dimensional random walk models of individual animal movement and their application to trap counts modelling 95%
- Site Pattern Probabilities Under the Multispecies Coalescent and a Relaxed Molecular Clock: Theory and Applications 95%
- Nothing better to do? Environment quality and the evolution of cooperation by partner choice 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Influence of the large-Z effect during contact between butterfly sister species 95%
- Adaptive peak tracking as explanation of sparse fossil data across fluctuating ancient environments 95%
- Dynamical BLUP modeling of mean reaction norm evolution, accommodating changing environments, overlapping generations, and multivariate data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.