Taxonomic, temporal, and spatial variation in the dynamics of High-Arctic arthropod populations
Høye, T. T.; Loboda, S.; Koltz, A. M.; Gillespie, M. A. K.; Bowden, J. J.; Schmidt, N. M.
Show abstract
Time-series data on arthropod populations are critical for understanding the magnitude, direction, and drivers of abundance changes. However, most arthropod monitoring programs are short-lived and limited in taxonomic resolution and spatial extent. Consequently, variation in population dynamics among taxa and habitats remains poorly understood. Monitoring data from the Arctic are particularly underrepresented, yet important to assessments of species abundance changes because many anthropogenic drivers of change that are present in other regions are absent in polar regions. Here, we utilise 24 years of abundance data from Zackenberg in High-Arctic Greenland, which is the longest running Arctic arthropod monitoring program, to study temporal trends in abundance. Despite a strong warming signal in air temperature, we only find evidence of weak temporal trends in arthropod abundances across most taxa. These trends are more pronounced in the most recent decade, with change point analyses suggesting distinct non-linear dynamics within some functional groups such as predators and detritivores. Although the abundances of many taxa were correlated, we detected both positive and negative correlations, suggesting that multiple processes are affecting arthropod populations even in this relatively simple Arctic food web. Finally, we found clear differences among species within single families of arthropods, indicating that an apparent lack of change in abundance at broader taxonomic or functional levels could mask substantial species-specific trends. Our results reiterate the need for more basic research into the life-history, ecology, and adaptation of arthropod species to better understand their sensitivity to global changes. Significance statementTerrestrial arthropods, including insects and spiders, serve critical ecosystem functions and are excellent indicators of environmental change due to their physiology, short generation time, and abundance. The Arctic, with its rapid climate change and limited direct anthropogenic impact, is ideal for examining arthropod population dynamics. We use the most comprehensive, standardized dataset available on Arctic arthropods to evaluate the variability in population dynamics for the most common arthropod groups at various taxonomic levels across 24 years. Our results highlight that temporal trends of arthropod populations seem less directional in the Arctic than in temperate regions. Although abundances of some arthropod taxa are declining, particularly in recent decades, population trends still display high variation among time periods, taxa, and habitats.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Physiological responses to a changing winter climate in an early spring-breeding amphibian 91%
- Diet of Andean leaf-eared mice (Phyllotis) living at extreme elevations on Atacama volcanoes: insights from metagenomics, DNA metabarcoding, and stable isotopes 90%
- Increasing temperature weakens the positive effect of genetic diversity on population growth 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The most remarkable migrants - systematic analysis of the Western European insect flyway at a Pyrenean mountain pass 93%
- Continent-wide effects of urbanization on bird and mammal genetic diversity 93%
- Temperature accounts for the biodiversity of a hyperdiverse group of insects in urban Los Angeles 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Complete metamorphosis and microbiota turnover in insects 93%
- Genetic mechanisms and biological processes underlying host response to ophidiomycosis (Snake Fungal Disease) inferred from tissue-specific transcriptome analyses. 91%
- Testing the adaptive decoupling hypothesis in a hypermetaphorphic and sexually dimorphic insect, Neodiprion lecontei 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.