Back

Hypertension and Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors in Patients with Covid-19

Ip, A.; Parikh, K.; Parrillo, J. E.; Mathura, S.; Hansen, E.; Sawczuk, I. S.; Goldberg, S. L.

2020-04-29 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.04.24.20077388 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionCOVID-19 disproportionately affects those with comorbidities and the elderly. Hypertension is the most common pre-existing condition amongst COVID-19 patients. Upregulation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is common in hypertensive patients and may promote inflammation and ensuing cytokine storm in COVID-19. It is unknown whether RAAS inhibition with ACE1 inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) can be harmful or beneficial. MethodsWithin Hackensack Meridian Health network, the largest healthcare provider in New Jersey, we performed a retrospective, multicenter, convenience sampling study of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Demographics, clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were manually abstracted. Fishers exact tests, and logistic regression were performed. ResultsAmong 3017 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, 1584 (52.5%) carried a diagnosis of hypertension. In the discharged or deceased cohort, the overall mortality was significantly increased at 35% vs 13% among COVID-19 patients with hypertension. However, when adjusted for age, the effect of hypertension on mortality was greatly diminished, with a reduction in odds-ratio by over half; and completely disappeared when adjusted for other major covariates. The mortality rates were lower for hypertensive patients prescribed ACE1 (27%, p=0.001) or ARBs (33%, p=0.12) compared to other anti-hypertensive agents (39%) in the unadjusted analyses. RAAS inhibitor therapy appeared protective compared to other anti-hypertensive agents (p=0.001). ConclusionsWhile our results are limited by the retrospective nature of our study and by potential confounders, our data argue against a harmful effect of RAAS inhibition and support the HFSA/AHA/ACC joint statement recommending continuing ACE1 and ARB therapy in hypertensive COVID-19 patients.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Circulation Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.9%
5
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
6
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
7
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
9
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
10
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
11
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
12
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
13
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
14
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
15
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
16
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
17
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
18
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
19
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
22
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
27
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
Metabolism
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
29
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
30
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%